Retail Investors in Waterdrop Inc. (NYSE:WDH) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 13% Last Week
Retail Investors in Waterdrop Inc. (NYSE:WDH) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 13% Last Week
Key Insights
关键见解
- Significant control over Waterdrop by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 56% ownership
- Insiders own 22% of Waterdrop
- 散户投资者对Waterdrop的严格控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
- 共有3名投资者拥有该公司的多数股权,拥有56%的所有权
- 内部人士拥有 Waterdrop 22% 的股份
A look at the shareholders of Waterdrop Inc. (NYSE:WDH) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 27% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看Waterdrop Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:WDH)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。散户投资者持有该公司27%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
As a result, retail investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 13% gain.
结果,散户投资者是上周13%涨幅的最大受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Waterdrop.
在下图中,我们放大了Waterdrop的不同所有权组。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Waterdrop?
关于水滴,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。
Waterdrop already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Waterdrop, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Waterdrop已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Waterdrop过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Waterdrop. The company's largest shareholder is Tencent Holdings Limited, with ownership of 22%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 22% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 12% by the third-largest shareholder. Peng Shen, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Waterdrop进行有意义的投资。该公司的最大股东是腾讯控股有限公司,所有权为22%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约22%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有12%的所有权。作为第二大股东的彭慎也恰好拥有首席执行官的头衔。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 56% stake.
对股东登记册的更详细研究表明,前三名股东通过其56%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Waterdrop
Waterdrop 的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Waterdrop Inc.. Insiders have a US$95m stake in this US$435m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看来内部人士拥有Waterdrop Inc.的很大一部分股份。业内人士在这笔4.35亿美元的业务中持有9500万美元的股份。很高兴看到内部人士对这项业务进行如此投资。可能值得检查一下这些内部人士最近是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司27%的股份,因此不容易被忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司的政策。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股权所有权
With a stake of 12%, private equity firms could influence the Waterdrop board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
私募股权公司持有12%的股份,可能会影响Waterdrop董事会。一些投资者可能会为此感到鼓舞,因为私募股权有时能够鼓励制定有助于市场看到公司价值的策略。或者,这些持有人可能会在投资上市后退出投资。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 4.3%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们的数据显示,私营公司持有公司4.3%的股份。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过控股私营公司而对上市公司拥有权益,而不是以个人身份拥有权益。尽管很难得出任何宽泛的结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个需要进一步研究的领域。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
It appears to us that public companies own 22% of Waterdrop. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
在我们看来,上市公司拥有Waterdrop22%的股份。这可能是战略利益,两家公司可能有相关的商业利益。可能是他们已经消失了。这一裁定可能值得进一步调查。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他更为重要的因素。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我一直喜欢查看收入增长的历史。您也可以,通过访问此详细图表中的这张免费的历史收入和收益图表。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。