Veea Inc.'s (NASDAQ:VEEA) Stock Price Dropped 33% Last Week; Retail Investors Would Not Be Happy
Veea Inc.'s (NASDAQ:VEEA) Stock Price Dropped 33% Last Week; Retail Investors Would Not Be Happy
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Veea's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 49% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Insiders own 12% of Veea
- Veea擁有大量散戶投資者的所有權表明,關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
- 49% 的業務由前三名股東持有
- 內部人士擁有Veea12%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Veea Inc. (NASDAQ:VEEA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制了Veea Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:VEEA),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,散戶投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲51%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
As a result, retail investors as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$103m.
結果,在市值下降1.03億美元之後,散戶投資者作爲一個整體承受了最大的損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Veea, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究 Veea 的每種類型的所有者。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Veea?
關於Veea,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.
交易不太活躍的小公司通常缺少機構投資者,但是沒有機構投資者的大公司並不常見。
There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Veea, for yourself, below.
公司在股票登記處可能沒有任何機構的原因有很多。如果流動性(每天交易的股票數量)低,機構可能很難購買大量股票。如果公司不需要籌集資金,機構可能缺乏建立立場的機會。或者,該公司的某些方面可能使機構投資者望而卻步。機構投資者可能不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能還有其他因素在起作用。你可以在下面親眼看到Veea過去的收入表現。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Veea. Our data shows that NLabs Inc. is the largest shareholder with 38% of shares outstanding. Allen Salmasi is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Janice Smith holds about 0.2% of the company stock. Allen Salmasi, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
對沖基金在Veea的股票不多。我們的數據顯示,nLabs Inc.是最大股東,已發行股份的38%。艾倫·薩爾馬西是第二大股東,擁有12%的普通股,珍妮絲·史密斯持有公司約0.2%的股份。第二大股東艾倫·薩爾馬西也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 3 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現有3名最大股東共同擁有的股份登記冊不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Veea
Veea 的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Veea Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$214m, and insiders have US$25m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Veea Inc.合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲2.14億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值2500萬美元的股票。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 51% of Veea shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
公衆主要由個人投資者組成,共持有Veea51%的股份。有了這麼多的所有權,散戶投資者可以在影響股東回報的決策中共同發揮作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他們還可以行使權力,對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併進行投票。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
With an ownership of 38%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私募股權公司擁有38%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Veea that you should be aware of before investing here.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了Veea的4個警告信號,在投資之前,您應該注意這些信號。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。