Public Companies in Greenland Hong Kong Holdings Limited (HKG:337) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 152% Last Week
Public Companies in Greenland Hong Kong Holdings Limited (HKG:337) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 152% Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by public companies in Greenland Hong Kong Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- Greenland Holdings Corporation Limited owns 60% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 公共公司在绿地香港控股中拥有相当大的所有权,这表明它们在管理和业务策略上有更大的发言权
- 绿地控股有限公司拥有该公司60%的股份
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
If you want to know who really controls Greenland Hong Kong Holdings Limited (HKG:337), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that public companies own the lion's share in the company with 60% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解谁真正控制绿地香港控股有限公司(HKG:337),那么您将需要查看其股权登记簿的构成。 我们可以看到,公共公司拥有该公司60%的所有权。 换句话说,该集团将从对该公司的投资中获益最多(或损失最多)。
As a result, public companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$803m market cap following a 152% gain in the stock.
因此,公共公司上周取得了最高分,该公司股价上涨152%,市值达到了HK$80300万。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Greenland Hong Kong Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究绿地香港控股的每一种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Greenland Hong Kong Holdings?
机构持股告诉我们有关绿地香港控股的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
Less than 5% of Greenland Hong Kong Holdings is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.
绿地香港控股不到5%的股份由机构投资者持有。这表明一些基金已经注意到了该公司,但很多基金尚未购买其股票。如果公司正在增长收入,这可能表明它刚开始引起这些资金雄厚的投资者的关注。如果多个机构投资者同时试图进入股市,那么股价可能会大幅上涨。因此,请查看下面的历史收入轨迹,但请记住最重要的是未来。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Greenland Hong Kong Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is Greenland Holdings Corporation Limited, with ownership of 60%. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. With 6.9% and 3.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Weixian Wang and HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited are the second and third largest shareholders. Weixian Wang, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive.
对绿地香港控股的持仓基金不多。该公司最大的股东是绿地控股有限公司,持股60%。这基本上意味着他们有广泛的影响力,如果不是直接控制,也至少可以影响公司的未来。分别持有6.9%和3.3%的股份,玮贤汪和汇丰环球资产管理(英国)有限公司是第二和第三大股东。玮贤汪是第二大股东,同时也是高级主管。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究机构持股是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的一种好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现相同的目标。我们目前没有注意到该股票的任何分析师报告,因此该公司不大可能被广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Greenland Hong Kong Holdings
绿地香港控股的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Greenland Hong Kong Holdings Limited. As individuals, the insiders collectively own HK$55m worth of the HK$803m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but we usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们可以报告,内部持有者确实拥有绿地香港控股有限公司的股份。作为个人,内部持有者共同拥有价值5500万港元的公司总价值80300万港元。看到内部持有者有一定的投资是好事,但我们通常希望看到更高的内部持股。也许值得检查这些内部持有者是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Greenland Hong Kong Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
凭借30%的所有权,普通大众,主要由个人投资者组成,在绿地香港控股有一定的影响力。虽然这个所有权比例可能不足以左右有利于他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
We can see that public companies hold 60% of the Greenland Hong Kong Holdings shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
我们可以看到,上市公司持有绿地香港控股发行股份的60%。这可能是战略上的利益,这两家公司可能有相关的业务利益。也许它们已经分拆。这个持股可能值得进一步调查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Greenland Hong Kong Holdings you should be aware of, and 3 of them are potentially serious.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如:我们已经发现绿地香港控股存在4个警示信号,您应该注意其中3个可能很严重。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。