Private Companies Among Jinling Hotel Corporation, Ltd.'s (SHSE:601007) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 16% Last Week
Private Companies Among Jinling Hotel Corporation, Ltd.'s (SHSE:601007) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 16% Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Jinling Hotel Corporation by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 3 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 私人公司对金陵饭店股份有限公司的重大控制意味着普通公众有更多的权力来影响管理和治理决策
- 前三大股东拥有公司51%的股份。
- 公司过去的业绩以及所有权数据,有助于形成对业务前景的强烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of Jinling Hotel Corporation, Ltd. (SHSE:601007) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 54% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下金陵饭店股份有限公司(SHSE:601007)的股东,我们可以知道哪个群体最有权力。私人公司拥有54%的股份,这意味着他们在公司中拥有最多的股份。换句话说,该群体在投资公司中可获得最大利润(或蒙受最大损失)。
Clearly, private companies benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥390m last week.
显然,在上周,该公司的市值上涨了39000万人民币后,私人公司受益最多。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Jinling Hotel Corporation, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入挖掘金陵饭店股份有限公司每种所有者的情况,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jinling Hotel Corporation?
机构持股告诉我们关于金陵饭店股份有限公司的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Jinling Hotel Corporation. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Jinling Hotel Corporation, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所见,机构投资者在金陵饭店股份有限公司持有相当数量的股份。 这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人都会一样。在股市中,如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售某只股票,很常见会看到股价大幅下跌。因此值得查看金陵饭店股份有限公司的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Jinling Hotel Corporation is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Nanjing Jinling Holdings Ltd, with ownership of 44%. Shing Kwan Investment (Singapore) Pte Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 4.8% of common stock, and HuaAn Fund Management Company Ltd. holds about 3.1% of the company stock.
金陵饭店公司不是由对冲基金持有。该公司最大的股东是南京金陵控股有限公司,持有44%的股份。星群投资(新加坡)私人有限公司是第二大股东,持有公司普通股4.8%,华安基金管理有限公司持有约公司股份的3.1%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
经过更深入的挖掘,我们发现前3大股东共控制了公司股份的一半以上,这意味着他们有相当大的权力来影响公司的决策。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加研究价值,但研究分析师建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一个好习惯。该股票的一些分析人士需要更多的关注时间。
Insider Ownership Of Jinling Hotel Corporation
金陵大酒店公司的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.
我们注意到我们的数据不显示任何董事会成员持有股份。考虑到我们没有掌握内部持股情况,我们可能有缺失的数据。因此,有趣的是评估首席执行官的薪酬和任期。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 37% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Jinling Hotel Corporation. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
拥有37%股权的一般公众,主要是个人投资者,对金陵宾馆集团有一定程度的影响力。 尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 54%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们的数据显示,负责任的私人公司拥有该公司54%的股份。私人公司可能是相关方。有时,内部人员通过持有私人公司的股份来对公开公司产生影响,而不是以个人的身份,这很难得出任何一般性的结论,但值得进一步研究。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Jinling Hotel Corporation is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
在考虑拥有公司的不同股东群体时很值得注意,但还有其他更为重要的因素。请注意,金陵酒店股份有限公司在我们的投资分析中显示出了3个警示信号,您应了解这些...
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。