Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Industry Co., Ltd's (SHSE:603757) Market Cap Rises to CN¥3.6b
Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Industry Co., Ltd's (SHSE:603757) Market Cap Rises to CN¥3.6b
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant insider control over Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Industry implies vested interests in company growth
- A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 大元泵业存在着重要的内部控制,意味着对公司增长的利益关系。
- 共有4个投资者掌握51%的所有权。
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Industry Co., Ltd (SHSE:603757), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 65% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制了浙江大元泵业股份有限公司(SHSE:603757),重要的是要了解企业的所有权结构。 拥有该公司股份数量最多的集团,准确来说约占65%,是个别内部人士。 也就是说,如果股价上涨,该集团将获益最多(或者如果出现下跌,则损失最大)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥3.6b market cap following a 13% gain in the stock.
由于上周公司股票上涨13%,市值达到36亿人民币,内部人士获得了最高收益。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Industry.
在下面的图表中,我们将重点关注大元泵业不同的所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Industry?
机构持股告诉我们关于大元泵业的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
We can see that Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Industry does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Industry's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到大元泵业确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的相当一部分。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好对依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证保持警惕。他们也有时会做出错误的决策。当多家机构拥有一支股票时,总会存在他们正在进行的'拥挤交易'的风险。当这种交易出错时,多方可能竞相快速抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到大元泵业的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住故事还有更多内容。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Industry. Our data shows that Yuan Zai Han is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Guo Liang Wang and Yuan Fu Han, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 13%.
对于大元泵业,对冲基金持有的股票并不多。我们的数据显示,Yuan Zai Han是最大的股东,持有13%的股份。第二和第三大股东是Guo Liang Wang和Yuan Fu Han,持有相同数量的股份,各占13%。
On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
进一步观察后,我们发现前4大股东拥有51%的股份。换句话说,这些股东对公司决策具有重要影响力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Industry
大元泵业的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Industry Co., Ltd stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own CN¥2.3b worth of shares in the CN¥3.6b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起来内部持股超过了浙江大元泵业股份有限公司的一半。这给了他们很大的权力。这意味着他们在36亿人民币的公司中拥有23亿人民币的股份。这相当有意义。看到这样的投资水平是很好的。您可以在这里查看内部人员最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
看起来私人公司拥有福建启始集团有限责任公司44%的股权。私人公司可能是关联方。有时内部人员通过持有私人公司的股份而不是以个人身份拥有上市公司的利益。尽管很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意作为进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Industry that you should be aware of.
我发现查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经识别出大元泵业存在的2个警告信号,这是您应该注意的。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。