Does M/I Homes (NYSE:MHO) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does M/I Homes (NYSE:MHO) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, M/I Homes, Inc. (NYSE:MHO) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
沃伦·巴菲特曾说:"波动性与风险远非同义词。" 因此,明智的投资者知道,债务(通常涉及破产)是衡量一家公司风险程度的重要因素。值得注意的是,mi 家居公司(NYSE:MHO)确实有债务。但这笔债务是否会让股东感到担忧?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
为什么债务会带来风险?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
债务是帮助企业增长的工具,但如果一家企业无法偿还债权人,那么它存在的就是在债权人的掌控下。资本主义的重要组成部分是"创造性毁灭"的过程,即失败的企业被银行家无情清算。尽管这种情况并不常见,我们经常看到负债的公司因贷款人强迫其以低价募集资本而永久性稀释股东权益。然而,债务可以取代稀释,成为需要资金以高回报率投资增长的企业的极好工具。当我们考虑一家公司的债务使用时,首先要查看现金和债务。
How Much Debt Does M/I Homes Carry?
mi家居负债情况如何?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 M/I Homes had debt of US$917.2m, up from US$879.5m in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$838.7m, its net debt is less, at about US$78.4m.
下面的图片显示,在2024年6月,mi 家居的债务为9172万美元,比一年前的8795万美元有所增加。然而,由于其现金储备为8387万美元,其净债务更少,约为784万美元。
A Look At M/I Homes' Liabilities
mi 家居负债情况一览
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that M/I Homes had liabilities of US$536.6m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.06b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$838.7m and US$66.4m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$693.8m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
我们可以从最近的资产负债表中看到,M/I Homes拥有到期不超过一年的额外责任US$53660万,以及远期到期的US$10.6亿。另一方面,它拥有US$83870万的现金和US$6640万的应收款项。因此,其负债总额为US$69380万,超过了其现金和短期应收款项的总和。
Since publicly traded M/I Homes shares are worth a total of US$4.70b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.
由于公开交易的mi 家居股票总值为US$47亿,看来这种水平的负债不太可能构成重大威胁。尽管如此,明显的是,我们应该继续监控其资产负债表,以防恶化。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我们使用两个主要的比率来告诉我们相对于收益的债务水平。第一个是净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前利润(EBITDA),而第二个是其利润前利息和税(EBIT)覆盖其利息费用的次数(或其利息覆盖率,简称)。因此,我们考虑与折旧和摊销费用相关的盈利以及没有相关费用的盈利相对于债务水平。
M/I Homes has net debt of just 0.12 times EBITDA, suggesting it could ramp leverage without breaking a sweat. And remarkably, despite having net debt, it actually received more in interest over the last twelve months than it had to pay. So there's no doubt this company can take on debt while staying cool as a cucumber. Fortunately, M/I Homes grew its EBIT by 6.8% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine M/I Homes's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
M/I Homes的净债务仅为EBITDA的0.12倍,表明它可以轻松增加杠杆。值得注意的是,尽管有净债务,但在过去十二个月中,它实际上获得的利息比需要支付的还要多。因此,毫无疑问,这家公司可以负债而保持镇定。幸运的是,mi 家居在过去一年中将其EBIt增长了6.8%,使得负债负担看起来更容易应对。我们毫无疑问从资产负债表中对债务有了更多了解。但最重要的是,未来收入将决定M/I Homes维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果您想知道专业人士的看法,您可能会发现分析师利润预测的这份免费报告很有趣。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, M/I Homes recorded free cash flow of 37% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最后,业务需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润并不足够。因此,我们始终检查其EBIt中有多少被转化为自由现金流。回顾最近三年,mi 家居的自由现金流占其EBIt的37%,这比我们预期的要弱。这种较差的现金转化使得难以处理债务。
Our View
我们的观点
Happily, M/I Homes's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow. All these things considered, it appears that M/I Homes can comfortably handle its current debt levels. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - M/I Homes has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
mi 家居令人欢欣的利息覆盖率表明其在债务上具有优势。但更令人担忧的是,我们对其将EBIt转化为自由现金流的情况有些担心。考虑到所有这些因素,看来mi 家居可以轻松地处理其当前的债务水平。积极的一面是,这种杠杆可以提高股东回报,但潜在的风险是更大的损失风险,因此值得密切关注资产负债表。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中最多了解债务。然而,并非所有投资风险都存在于资产负债表内——远非如此。例如,mi 家居有1个警示标志,我们认为您应该注意。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有兴趣投资能够在不负债的情况下增长利润的企业,请查看这份免费列表,其中列出了在资产负债表上拥有净现金的成长型企业。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。