Micron Technology, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MU) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.3% Over the Past Week
Micron Technology, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MU) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.3% Over the Past Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Micron Technology implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 50% of the business is held by the top 23 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構在美光科技的大量持股意味着他們對該公司的股價有重大影響
- 23位最大股東持有General Mills公司50%的業務。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MU) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 81% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看美光科技股東,Inc.(納斯達克:MU)可以告訴我們哪個集團最具影響力。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司81%的所有權。換句話說,該集團將從他們對該公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$111b in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 47% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上週,機構投資者在公司市值達到1110億美元后獲益最多。投資回報率爲47%,上週的盈利將更受歡迎。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Micron Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地了解美光科技每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Micron Technology?
機構所有權對Micron Technology能夠告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Micron Technology. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Micron Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在美光科技中持有相當大的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也有時會犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,很容易看到股價大幅下跌。因此,檢查一下美光科技過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Micron Technology. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.8% of shares outstanding. With 8.3% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Capital Research and Management Company are the second and third largest shareholders.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能共同有力地影響董事會的決定。我們注意到對沖基金在美光科技中沒有具有有意義的投資。現在,先鋒集團是公司最大的股東之一,持有8.8%的股份。分別持有8.3%和5.2%的股份,黑石集團和卡普特研究與管理公司是第二和第三大股東。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 23 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
Sea股票內部持有情況 我們最新的數據表明,內部持有相當比例的Sea Limited的股份。內部人士持有價值65億美元的這家價值430億美元的公司。這是相當有意義的。大多數人會高興地看到董事會正在與他們一起投資。您可能希望訪問此處的免費圖表,以顯示內部人員的最近交易情況。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Micron Technology
Micron Technology的內部股權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Micron Technology, Inc.. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$268m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,美光科技機構內部持有的股份不到1%。這是一家非常大的公司,所以預計內部人員持有的比例較小。儘管他們的持股量不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值2.68億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到至少有一些內部持股總是好事,但值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Micron Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在美光科技持有19%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能還不足以左右政策決策偏好,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。