share_log

Is Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) Using Too Much Debt?

藝康集團(紐交所:ECL)是否使用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  06:47

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that Ecolab Inc. (NYSE:ECL) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:「波動性遠非風險的代名詞。」當你檢查公司的資產負債表的風險時,考慮它的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業倒閉時通常會涉及債務。我們可以看到,Ecolab Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:ECL)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但是這筆債務是股東關心的問題嗎?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但是如果企業無法償還貸款,那麼債務就任其擺佈。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款人可以控制業務。但是,更常見(但仍然令人痛苦)的情況是,它必須以低廉的價格籌集新的股本,從而永久稀釋股東。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們考慮公司使用債務時,我們首先將現金和債務放在一起考慮。

What Is Ecolab's Net Debt?

Ecolab 的淨負債是多少?

As you can see below, Ecolab had US$7.53b of debt at June 2024, down from US$8.61b a year prior. However, it also had US$384.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$7.14b.

如下所示,截至2024年6月,Ecolab的債務爲75.3億美元,低於去年同期的86.1億美元。但是,它也有3.84億美元的現金,因此其淨負債爲71.4億美元。

big
NYSE:ECL Debt to Equity History October 3rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:ECL 債務與股本的比率歷史記錄 2024 年 10 月 3 日

A Look At Ecolab's Liabilities

看看 Ecolab 的負債

According to the last reported balance sheet, Ecolab had liabilities of US$3.85b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$9.31b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$384.0m in cash and US$3.04b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$9.73b.

根據上次報告的資產負債表,Ecolab在12個月內到期的負債爲38.5億美元,12個月以後到期的負債爲93.1億美元。與此相抵消的是,它有3.84億美元的現金和30.4億美元的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額97.3億美元。

Of course, Ecolab has a titanic market capitalization of US$72.1b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

當然,Ecolab的市值高達721億美元,因此這些負債可能是可以控制的。話雖如此,很明顯,我們應該繼續監控其資產負債表,以免情況惡化。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我們使用兩個主要比率來告知我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),第二個是其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出(或簡稱利息保障)的多少倍。因此,我們將債務與收益的關係考慮在內,包括和不包括折舊和攤銷費用。

With a debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.1, Ecolab uses debt artfully but responsibly. And the fact that its trailing twelve months of EBIT was 8.5 times its interest expenses harmonizes with that theme. We note that Ecolab grew its EBIT by 27% in the last year, and that should make it easier to pay down debt, going forward. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Ecolab can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Ecolab的債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率爲2.1,巧妙但負責任地使用債務。而且,其過去十二個月的息稅前利潤是其利息支出的8.5倍,這一事實與這一主題一致。我們注意到,去年,Ecolab的息稅前利潤增長了27%,這將使未來更容易償還債務。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但最終,該業務的未來盈利能力將決定Ecolab能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Ecolab produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 70% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

但是我們最終的考慮因素也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤來償還債務;它需要冷硬現金。因此,合乎邏輯的步驟是研究該息稅前利潤與實際自由現金流相匹配的比例。在過去的三年中,Ecolab產生了穩健的自由現金流,相當於其息稅前利潤的70%,與我們的預期差不多。這種冷硬現金意味着它可以在需要的時候減少債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

The good news is that Ecolab's demonstrated ability to grow its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow is also very heartening. Looking at the bigger picture, we think Ecolab's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - Ecolab has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

好消息是,Ecolab表現出的增長eBIT的能力使我們感到高興,就像毛茸茸的小狗對待幼兒一樣。這僅僅是好消息的開始,因爲將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流也非常令人鼓舞。從大局來看,我們認爲Ecolab使用債務似乎相當合理,我們對此並不擔心。雖然債務確實會帶來風險,但如果明智地使用,它也可以帶來更高的股本回報率。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。例如-Ecolab 有 1 個警告標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,通常最好將注意力集中在沒有淨負債的公司身上。您可以訪問我們的此類公司的特別名單(所有公司都有利潤增長記錄)。它是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論