Graham Holdings Company (NYSE:GHC) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 59%
Graham Holdings Company (NYSE:GHC) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 59%
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Graham Holdings' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
- Recent purchases by insiders
- 机构持股比例高意味着格雷厄姆控股的股价对它们的交易行为敏感。
- 前八大股东持有该业务的51%。
- 最近有内部人员购买。
Every investor in Graham Holdings Company (NYSE:GHC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 59% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
格雷厄姆控股公司(纽交所:GHC)的每位投资者都应该注意最强大的股东群体。该公司持有最多股份的群体,准确地说约占公司股份的59%,是机构。换句话说,这个群体从他们投资公司中将获得最多的回报(或损失)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由于机构拥有大量的资金和研究能力,因此机构所有权往往具有相当的分量,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构在一家企业中投资的规模可视为该企业的一项重要资产。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Graham Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究格雷厄姆控股的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Graham Holdings?
机构持股告诉我们关于格雷厄姆控股的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that Graham Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Graham Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到格雷厄姆控股确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司的股票的一大部分。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多家机构同时改变对某股票的观点,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看格雷厄姆控股的营收历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 5.3% of Graham Holdings. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Donald Graham is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.9% and 7.8% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Timothy O'Shaughnessy directly holds 1.9% of the total shares outstanding.
由于机构投资者拥有超过公司发行股票的一半,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。我们的数据显示,对冲基金拥有格雷厄姆控股5.3%的股份。这很有趣,因为对冲基金可能会非常活跃和激进。许多对冲基金寻找中期催化剂,以推动股价上涨。唐纳德·格雷厄姆目前是公司最大的股东,持有13%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约9.9%和7.8%的股份。此外,公司CEO蒂莫西·奥肖内西直接持有公司总流通股份的1.9%。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
进一步调查发现,超过一半的Bentley Systems股份归前8位股东所有,这表明大股东和小股东的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
尽管有必要研究公司的机构持股数据,但研究分析师的情绪也是有道理的,以了解风向。这只股票有一些分析师的覆盖,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵盖面的空间。
Insider Ownership Of Graham Holdings
格雷厄姆控股的内部股权所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Graham Holdings Company. It has a market capitalization of just US$3.5b, and insiders have US$643m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起来内部人士拥有格雷厄姆控股公司相当大的比例。它的市值仅为35亿美元,内部人士拥有64300万美元的股票价值。这是相当显著的。看到这种投资水平是很好的。您可以在这里检查一下,看看这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Graham Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
持有18%股份,广大公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对格雷厄姆控股有一定的影响力。尽管这一所有权规模可能不足以左右政策决策向他们方向倾斜,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Graham Holdings is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is concerning...
在考虑拥有公司的不同群体时是值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。请注意,在我们的投资分析中,格雷厄姆控股显示出了2个警示信号,其中1个是令人关注的...
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。