LKQ (NASDAQ:LKQ) Hasn't Managed To Accelerate Its Returns
LKQ (NASDAQ:LKQ) Hasn't Managed To Accelerate Its Returns
If you're not sure where to start when looking for the next multi-bagger, there are a few key trends you should keep an eye out for. One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. Basically this means that a company has profitable initiatives that it can continue to reinvest in, which is a trait of a compounding machine. Having said that, from a first glance at LKQ (NASDAQ:LKQ) we aren't jumping out of our chairs at how returns are trending, but let's have a deeper look.
如果您不確定從哪裏開始尋找下一個成倍增長的股票,有幾個關鍵趨勢是您應該留意的。一種常見的方法是嘗試找到一個資本回報率(ROCE)不斷增長的公司,同時資本投入也在增加。基本上,這意味着公司有盈利的倡議,可以持續進行再投資,這是一個複利機器的特徵。話雖如此,就從對納斯達克的LKQ(NASDAQ:LKQ)的第一眼看來,我們並沒有因爲回報的趨勢而興奮,但讓我們深入了解一下。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
我們對 Enphase Energy 的資本僱用回報率的看法:正如我們上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的資本回報率沒有提高,但它正在重新投資於業務。投資者必須認爲未來會有更好的前景,因爲股票表現良好,使持股五年以上的股東獲得了 690% 的收益。最終,如果基本趨勢持續存在,我們不會對它成爲一隻多頭股持有期很久很有信心。
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for LKQ:
對於那些不了解的人,ROCE是衡量公司每年稅前利潤(其回報)與業務中投入資本的相對關係的指標。 分析師使用此公式來計算LKQ:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。
0.11 = US$1.3b ÷ (US$15b - US$2.9b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
0.11 = 130億美元 ÷ (150億美元 - 29億美元)(基於2024年6月的過去十二個月)。
Therefore, LKQ has an ROCE of 11%. By itself that's a normal return on capital and it's in line with the industry's average returns of 11%.
因此,LKQ的ROCE爲11%。單獨看來,這是一個正常的資本回報率,與行業平均回報率11%相符。
In the above chart we have measured LKQ's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for LKQ .
在上表中,我們測量了LKQ之前的ROCE與其之前的表現,但未來可能更重要。如果您感興趣,可以查看分析師在我們免費的LKQ分析師報告中的預測。
The Trend Of ROCE
當尋找下一個倍增器時,如果您不確定從哪裏開始,請關注幾個關鍵趨勢。首先,我們希望看到一個經過驗證的資本使用率。如果您看到這一點,通常意味着這是一家擁有出色業務模式和大量盈利再投資機會的公司。然而,調查蒙托克可再生能源公司(NASDAQ:MNTK)後,我們認爲它的現行趨勢不符合倍增器的模式。
Things have been pretty stable at LKQ, with its capital employed and returns on that capital staying somewhat the same for the last five years. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. So unless we see a substantial change at LKQ in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger. With fewer investment opportunities, it makes sense that LKQ has been paying out a decent 32% of its earnings to shareholders. Given the business isn't reinvesting in itself, it makes sense to distribute a portion of earnings among shareholders.
在LKQ,資本運用和資本回報率在過去五年保持相對穩定。在觀察到一個成熟穩定的企業時,看到這種情況並非罕見,因爲該企業可能已經過了重投資收益的階段。因此,除非在LKQ的ROCE和額外投資方面出現重大變化,否則我們不會對它成爲大贏家抱有太大期待。由於投資機會較少,可以理解LKQ已經向股東支付了32%的盈利。鑑於該企業沒有自我再投資,將一部分利潤分配給股東是明智之舉。
The Bottom Line On LKQ's ROCE
關於LKQ的ROCE的要點
We can conclude that in regards to LKQ's returns on capital employed and the trends, there isn't much change to report on. And with the stock having returned a mere 36% in the last five years to shareholders, you could argue that they're aware of these lackluster trends. As a result, if you're hunting for a multi-bagger, we think you'd have more luck elsewhere.
我們可以得出結論,在LKQ的資本運用回報率和趨勢方面,並沒有太多變化可報告。最近五年,該股票僅爲股東提供了36%的回報,您可以說他們已經意識到這些乏喵的趨勢。因此,如果您在尋找大贏家,我們認爲您在其他地方更有可能獲得好運。
One more thing, we've spotted 3 warning signs facing LKQ that you might find interesting.
另外,我們發現了面臨LKQ的3個警告信號,您可能會感興趣。
While LKQ isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.
儘管LKQ的回報率不高,請查看這份免費的企業列表,這些企業在權益投資回報率方面表現優異,並擁有穩固的資產負債表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。