Wenlong Shangguan Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials Technology Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:688359) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 18%last Week
Wenlong Shangguan Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials Technology Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:688359) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 18%last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials TechnologyLtd implies vested interests in company growth
- 51% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- 11% of Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials TechnologyLtd is held by Institutions
- 光州三福新材料科技有限公司中具有重要內部控制權暗示着公司增長中的既得利益
- 前4大股東持有51%的業務股份
- 光州三福新材料科技有限公司11%的股份被機構持有
If you want to know who really controls Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials Technology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:688359), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道誰真正控制着光州三福新材料科技有限公司(SHSE:688359),那麼您需要看看其股權登記冊的構成。我們可以看到,個人內部人員擁有公司51%的所有權。也就是說,該集團將從股價上漲中獲益最多(或者如果出現下跌,將損失最多)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥3.4b market cap following a 18% gain in the stock.
作爲結果,在公司股價上漲18%之後,內部人員上週得分最高,市值達到34億人民幣。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials TechnologyLtd, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究廣州三福新材料科技股份有限公司每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials TechnologyLtd?
機構持有權告訴我們廣州三福新材料科技股份有限公司的什麼信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials TechnologyLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials TechnologyLtd's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
廣州三福新材料科技股份有限公司已經有機構出現在股東名冊上。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一些信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一個股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看一下廣州三福新材料科技股份有限公司的收益歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials TechnologyLtd. The company's CEO Wenlong Shangguan is the largest shareholder with 30% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 16% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.2% by the third-largest shareholder.
對沖基金沒有持有廣州三福新材料科技有限公司的股份。該公司的CEO尚冠文持有30%的流通股,是最大的股東。第二大股東持有約16%的流通股,第三大股東持有3.2%的股份。
On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步觀察後,我們發現前4大股東擁有51%的股份。換句話說,這些股東對公司決策具有重要影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
儘管研究一家公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增添價值,但研究分析師建議以深入了解股票的預期表現也是一個好的做法。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此可能爲人所知甚少。
Insider Ownership Of Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials TechnologyLtd
廣州三福新材料科技有限公司的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials Technology Co.,Ltd. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥3.4b, that means they have CN¥1.7b worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據顯示,廣州三福新材料科技有限公司的內部持有大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做決定。鑑於它的市值爲34億人民幣,這意味着他們擁有17億人民幣的股份。大多數人都會高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望免費發現他們是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 37% stake in Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials TechnologyLtd. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在廣州三福新材料科技有限公司持有37%的股份。儘管這一群體不能必然左右決策,但他們確實可以對公司的管理產生實質影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Guangzhou Sanfu New Materials TechnologyLtd (of which 2 shouldn't be ignored!) you should know about.
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常值得,但還有其他更重要的因素。比如風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現廣州三福新材料科技有限公司的3個警示信號(其中2個不容忽視!)您應該了解。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。