Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as PowerTECH Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301369) Touches CN¥4.0b Market Cap
Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as PowerTECH Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301369) Touches CN¥4.0b Market Cap
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in PowerTECH's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- The top 2 shareholders own 65% of the company
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 內部人士似乎對PowerTECH的增長有着極大的利益,這可以從他們持有的大量股份中看出
- 前2位股東擁有該公司的65%的股份。
- 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。
Every investor in PowerTECH Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301369) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 65% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
PowerTECH有限公司(SZSE:301369)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東團體。擁有最大股份的是個人內部人士,持股比例爲65%。換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥543m last week.
很明顯,上週公司的市值增加了54300萬人民幣後,內部人受益最多。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of PowerTECH.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注PowerTECH的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PowerTECH?
機構投資者持有PowerTECH的意義是什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in PowerTECH. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at PowerTECH's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在PowerTECH中持有相當數量的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的PowerTECH收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
PowerTECH is not owned by hedge funds. Chimei Zhang is currently the company's largest shareholder with 33% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 32% and 2.3% of the stock. Junling Zheng, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
PowerTECH並非由對沖基金所有。張池梅目前是公司最大的股東,持有33%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約32%和2.3%的股份。鄭俊玲是第二大股東,也是公司首席執行官。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
普通公衆持有北方銅業的23%股份。雖然這個群體不能決定公司的命運,但它肯定會對公司運營方式產生真正的影響。
Insider Ownership Of PowerTECH
PowerTECH的內部人士持有更多的股份。這使得他們有效地控制了公司。考慮到其市值爲3.7億元人民幣,這意味着他們持有24億元人民幣的股票。大多數人都會認爲這是一個積極的因素,表明他們與股東有強烈的利益一致性。單擊此處以查看這些內部人士是買入還是賣出。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of PowerTECH Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a CN¥2.6b stake in this CN¥4.0b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部持有PowerTECH Co., Ltd.超過一半的股份。 這使他們有效控制了公司。 因此,他們在這家40億人民幣的企業中持有26億人民幣的股份。 大多數人會認爲這是一個積極的跡象,顯示與股東之間有強烈的一致性。 您可以點擊此處查看那些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over PowerTECH. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有26%股權,主要是由個人投資者組成的普通公衆,在PowerTECH身上具有一定的影響力。 雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以左右有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with PowerTECH (at least 3 which don't sit too well with us) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。 比如,始終存在的投資風險。 我們已經識別出PowerTECH存在4個警示信號(至少有3個我們不太滿意),了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。