Institutional Investors in Nu Holdings Ltd. (NYSE:NU) See US$2.0b Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Institutional Investors in Nu Holdings Ltd. (NYSE:NU) See US$2.0b Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Nu Holdings implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 50% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構在Nu控股公司的大量持股意味着它們對該公司的股價有重大影響
- 前10大股東持有50%的股份。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
Every investor in Nu Holdings Ltd. (NYSE:NU) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 52% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
紐約證券交易所:NU控股有限公司(NYSE:NU)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東團體。持有最大股份的團體是擁有52%所有權的機構。換句話說,這個團體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 3.1% last week. Still, the 81% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
投資虧錢是股東們都不願意看到的事情,尤其是上週看到他們持有的價值下降了3.1%的機構投資者。不過,81%的一年漲幅可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。然而,我們會假設他們會對未來的弱點保持警惕。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Nu Holdings.
讓我們更仔細地看一下,不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Nu Holdings的什麼信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nu Holdings?
機構持股告訴我們關於Nu Holdings的什麼信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Nu Holdings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Nu Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Nu Holdings已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這說明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會做的。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看下面Nu Holdings的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Nu Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Rua California Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. With 5.3% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Capital Research and Management Company and Sequoia Capital Operations LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過公司一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要權力。Nu控股不屬於對沖基金。我們的數據顯示,Rua California有限公司是最大的股東,持有20%的股份。分別持有5.3%和5.2%流通股的Capital Research and Management Company和Sequoia Capital Operations LLC是第二和第三大股東。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步調查發現,該公司的股份超過一半由前十大股東持有,表明較大股東的利益在某種程度上被較小股東平衡。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Nu Holdings
Nu控股的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Nu Holdings Ltd.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$1.7b worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.
我們可以報告說,Nu控股有限公司內部人員擁有股份。 這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員合計擁有價值17億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 我們有時會關注他們是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Nu Holdings. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
在擁有13%的股權下,一般公衆,主要是個人投資者,對Nu控股有一定的影響力。 儘管這群人可能不能決定公司的走向,但肯定會對公司的運行方式產生真正的影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 5.2% stake in Nu Holdings. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
股權投資公司持有Nu控股5.2%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。一些投資者可能會因此感到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠鼓勵市場看到公司的價值。另一方面,這些持有人可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 20%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
思考擁有一家公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解江蘇愛爾福智能電路技術有限公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如:我們已經發現江蘇愛爾福智能電路技術有限公司存在5個警告信號,其中2個是重大的。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 7.2% of Nu Holdings stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
公開公司目前擁有Nu控股股票7.2%。很難確定,但這表明它們在業務利益上存在交織。這可能是一種戰略性持股,因此值得留意所有權變動的情況。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Nu Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors.
始終值得考慮公司股東的不同群體。但要更好地了解Nu控股,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。