Individual Investors Invested in Red Phase INC. (SZSE:300427) up 20% Last Week, Insiders Too Were Rewarded
Individual Investors Invested in Red Phase INC. (SZSE:300427) up 20% Last Week, Insiders Too Were Rewarded
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Red phase by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 13 shareholders own 44% of the company
- 27% of Red phase is held by insiders
- 個人投資者對紅盤具有重要控制權,這意味着普通公衆對管理和治理決策有更大的影響力
- 公司前13大股東擁有44%的股份。
- 內部人持有紅盤的27%
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Red phase INC. (SZSE:300427), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 56% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解紅盤公司(SZSE:300427)真正控制權的感覺,重要的是了解該企業的所有權結構。 持有最大股份的是個人投資者,擁有56%的所有權。 也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將最大受益(或者如果出現下行,將承受最大損失)。
Following a 20% increase in the stock price last week, individual investors profited the most, but insiders who own 27% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
上週股價上漲20%後,個人投資者獲利最多,但佔27%股份的內部人士也有望從漲價中受益。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Red phase.
在下面的圖表中,我們將放大Red phase的不同所有權群體。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Red phase?
機構持股告訴我們關於Red phase的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Red phase does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Red phase, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到Red phase確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股份的一部分。 這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅憑這個事實來依靠,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試賣出某支股票,很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Red phase的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。 當然,也要考慮其他因素。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Red phase. Bao Yang is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. With 6.7% and 6.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Cheng Yang and Wolong Electric Group Co.,Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders. Cheng Yang, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
在紅色通道中,對沖基金持有的股份不多。鮑洋目前是該公司最大的股東,持有15%的流通股。程洋和臥龍電驅股份有限公司分別持有流通股的6.7%和6.2%,是第二和第三大股東。程洋,第二大股東,也是首席執行官。
Our studies suggest that the top 13 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前13名股東共控制不到該公司股份的一半,這意味着該公司股份廣泛分散,沒有主要股東。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但同時調查分析師建議也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該公司的分析師報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Red phase
紅色通道的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Red phase INC.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥2.5b, and insiders have CN¥669m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看起來內部持有大宗紅色階段股份。其市值僅爲人民幣25億,內部人員名下的股份價值爲66900萬人民幣。我們會認爲這顯示了與股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是業務的創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人員是在買入還是賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 56% of Red phase shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
一般公衆,主要是由個體投資者組成,共同持有紅色階段56%的股份。這種所有權水平讓來自更廣泛公衆的投資者具有一定的權力,可以影響關鍵政策決策,如董事會組成、高管薪酬和股利支付比率。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 6.2% of the Red phase shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
我們可以看到上市公司持有已發行的紅色股份的6.2%。很難確定,但這表明它們有交織的業務利益。這可能是戰略性股份,所以值得關注這一領域的所有權變化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Red phase (1 is concerning) that you should be aware of.
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已確定紅色階段存在2個警示信號(1個令人擔憂),您應該了解。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。