Returns At Genting Singapore (SGX:G13) Appear To Be Weighed Down
Returns At Genting Singapore (SGX:G13) Appear To Be Weighed Down
What are the early trends we should look for to identify a stock that could multiply in value over the long term? One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. Put simply, these types of businesses are compounding machines, meaning they are continually reinvesting their earnings at ever-higher rates of return. Although, when we looked at Genting Singapore (SGX:G13), it didn't seem to tick all of these boxes.
要確定一隻可以長期成倍增長的股票,我們應該尋找哪些早期趨勢?一種常見的方法是嘗試尋找一家動用資本回報率(ROCE)不斷增加且所用資本不斷增加的公司。簡而言之,這些類型的企業是複合機器,這意味着他們不斷以更高的回報率對收益進行再投資。但是,當我們查看新加坡雲頂(SGX: G13)時,它似乎並沒有勾選所有這些方框。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
資本使用回報率(ROCE):這是什麼?
Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. The formula for this calculation on Genting Singapore is:
爲了澄清一下你是否不確定,ROCE是評估公司從投資於其業務的資本中獲得多少稅前收入(按百分比計算)的指標。新加坡雲頂的計算公式爲:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)
0.086 = S$728m ÷ (S$9.2b - S$709m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
0.086 = 7.28億新元 ÷(92億新元至7.09億新元)(基於截至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。
So, Genting Singapore has an ROCE of 8.6%. On its own that's a low return, but compared to the average of 5.0% generated by the Hospitality industry, it's much better.
因此,新加坡雲頂的投資回報率爲8.6%。這本身就是一個很低的回報,但與酒店業平均5.0%的回報率相比,要好得多。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for Genting Singapore compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for Genting Singapore .
上面你可以看到新加坡雲頂目前的投資回報率與其先前的資本回報率相比如何,但從過去可以看出來的只有那麼多。如果您有興趣,可以在我們的免費雲頂新加坡分析師報告中查看分析師的預測。
How Are Returns Trending?
退貨趨勢如何?
Over the past five years, Genting Singapore's ROCE and capital employed have both remained mostly flat. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. With that in mind, unless investment picks up again in the future, we wouldn't expect Genting Singapore to be a multi-bagger going forward. That being the case, it makes sense that Genting Singapore has been paying out 70% of its earnings to its shareholders. If the company is in fact lacking growth opportunities, that's one of the viable alternatives for the money.
在過去的五年中,新加坡雲頂的投資回報率和使用的資本基本保持不變。在研究一家成熟穩定的企業時,這種情況並不少見,因爲該企業可能已經過了商業週期的這一階段,因此不進行收益再投資。考慮到這一點,除非將來投資再次回升,否則我們預計新加坡雲頂未來不會成爲一個多口袋企業。既然如此,新加坡雲頂將其收益的70%支付給股東是有道理的。如果公司實際上缺乏增長機會,那是可行的資金替代方案之一。
The Bottom Line On Genting Singapore's ROCE
新加坡雲頂投資回報率的底線
We can conclude that in regards to Genting Singapore's returns on capital employed and the trends, there isn't much change to report on. And with the stock having returned a mere 9.7% in the last five years to shareholders, you could argue that they're aware of these lackluster trends. So if you're looking for a multi-bagger, the underlying trends indicate you may have better chances elsewhere.
我們可以得出結論,就新加坡雲頂的已動用資本回報率和趨勢而言,沒有太大變化可報告。而且,在過去五年中,該股向股東的回報率僅爲9.7%,你可以說他們意識到這些乏善可陳的趨勢。因此,如果你正在尋找一款多袋裝車,潛在的趨勢表明你在其他地方可能有更好的機會。
One more thing to note, we've identified 1 warning sign with Genting Singapore and understanding it should be part of your investment process.
還有一件事需要注意,我們已經向雲頂新加坡確定了一個警告信號,並知道這應該是您投資過程的一部分。
While Genting Singapore isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.
儘管雲頂新加坡的回報率並不高,但請查看這份免費清單,列出了資產負債表穩健的股本回報率高的公司。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。