share_log

After 300 Miles of New York City Driving, AMCI Testing's Latest Evaluation of Tesla FSD ( Supervised) Demonstrates It Is Clearly Not Capable of Self-driven Taxi Duty

After 300 Miles of New York City Driving, AMCI Testing's Latest Evaluation of Tesla FSD ( Supervised) Demonstrates It Is Clearly Not Capable of Self-driven Taxi Duty

紐約市行駛300英里後,AMCI測試公司的最新評估顯示,特斯拉FSD(監督模式)明顯無法勝任自動出租車職責。
PR Newswire ·  10/10 06:00

Latest hardware and software are still suspect with excessive interventions

干預過度仍令人懷疑最新的硬件和軟件

LOS ANGELES, Oct. 10, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- After over 1000 miles evaluating Tesla's FSD (Supervised) on the West Coast with very disturbing results, we decided that in advance of their "ROBOTAXI" announcement, we would conduct an in-depth assessment in the most taxi-centric city in America, New York City.

洛杉磯,2024年10月10日 /PRNewswire/ — 在對特斯拉在西海岸的FSD(受監管)進行了超過1000英里的評估,結果非常令人不安,我們決定在他們宣佈 「ROBOTAXI」 之前,我們將對美國最以出租車爲中心的城市紐約市進行深入評估。

New York City, in addition to the prevalence of taxi cabs, has a population density and unique street layout that presented challenges for FSD even beyond what we experienced in Southern California.

除了出租車盛行外,紐約市的人口密度和獨特的街道佈局給FSD帶來的挑戰甚至超過了我們在南加州所經歷的挑戰。

In keeping with AMCI Testing's protocol, assessment in New York City was carried out with a " Hardware 4" equipped 2024 Model 3 running the most-current software, 12.5.4. Over the course of the latest evaluation- in NYC traffic and surrounds:

根據AMCI測試的協議,紐約市的評估是在裝備 「硬件4」 的2024 Model 3上進行的,該模型運行最新的軟件12.5.4。在最新的評估過程中,紐約市的交通及周邊地區:

FSD AVERAGED EVEN HIGHER THAN PREVIOUS "INTERVENTION" RATE OF 1 EVERY 11 MILES.

FSD 的平均值甚至高於之前每 11 英里 1 次的 「干預」 率。

Remember, AMCI Testing's professional drivers only" intervene" if FSD's actions put the occupants, the public or other motorists at risk.

請記住,只有當FSD的行爲使乘員、公衆或其他駕駛者處於危險之中時,AMCI Testing的專業司機才會 「干預」。

Among the most EGREGIOUS intervention scenarios encountered:

遇到的最嚴重的干預情景包括:

  • Accelerating to 37mph in a 25mph zone on a one-lane, one-way neighborhood street at night, with parked cars on both sides.
  • Abruptly braking from 40mph to 15mph inside tunnels after losing GPS signal, seriously risking a rear-end collision.
  • Abruptly braking from 70mph to 40mph on state highway with no vehicle or obstacle in its path.
  • In situations with two left-hand turn lanes, attempting U-turns from the most distant lane, across left-hand turning traffic.
  • Running stop signs at the end of highway entrance ramps.
  • Making a left-hand turn from a divided boulevard on green, but not stopping at the islands successive red for opposing traffic.
  • When traffic made it impossible to enter the left-turn lane to turn left from a one-way boulevard, FSD attempted the left from one lane over- across the path of a NYPD patrol car.
  • Driving with aggressive speed across an intersection, FSD didn't brake for a teenager running out from between parked cars, outside a painted crosswalk.
  • Right turn on red, illegal in New York.
  • 夜間在一條單車道的鄰里街道上,以25英里/小時的速度加速到37英里/小時,兩邊都停着車。
  • 丟失 GPS 信號後,在隧道內突然從 40 英里/小時制動到 15 英里/小時,嚴重存在追尾碰撞的風險。
  • 在沒有車輛或障礙物的情況下,在國道上從70英里/小時突然制動到40英里/小時。
  • 在有兩條左轉車道的情況下,嘗試從最遠的車道掉頭,穿過左轉的車道。
  • 高速公路入口坡道盡頭的跑步停車標誌。
  • 在綠道上分開的林蔭大道上向左轉彎,但不要在島嶼上連續停靠紅色,因爲對面交通。
  • 當交通導致無法進入左轉車道從單向林蔭大道左轉時,FSD 試圖從一條車道向左行駛,穿過紐約警察局巡邏車的道路。
  • FSD 以極快的速度開車穿過十字路口,在彩繪的人行橫道外,一名少年從停放的汽車之間跑出來,沒有剎車。
  • 右轉紅色,在紐約是非法的。

Guy Mangiamele, the Director of AMCI Testing said " If Tesla's Robotaxi is running Hardware 4/v 12.5.4 it may well work in a film studio carpark, but AMCI Testing's assessment shows it falls well short of any true autonomy in the real world."

AMCI測試總監蓋伊·曼賈梅勒說:「如果特斯拉的Robotaxi運行硬件4/v 12.5.4,它很可能會在電影製片廠的停車場運行,但AMCI Testing的評估表明,它遠遠沒有達到現實世界中任何真正的自主權。」

We wait with interest to see what Tesla shows and the veracity of their autonomous Robotaxi performance claims.

我們饒有興趣地等着看特斯拉的表現以及他們的自動駕駛Robotaxi性能聲明的真實性。

AMCI Testing has 6 videos of its previous Tesla evaluations intended to demonstrate the complex issues of trust and performance that FSD continues to pose to drivers and the public. Please follow the link to view them. Go to to sign up to receive updates as they occur.

AMCI Testing有6段關於其先前特斯拉評估的視頻,旨在展示FSD繼續向駕駛員和公衆構成的複雜的信任和績效問題。請點擊鏈接查看。前往註冊以接收更新信息。

About AMCI Testing

關於 AMCI 測試

AMCI testing is an independent automotive research firm, specializing in unbiased, exclusive, comparative evaluations of automotive products since 1984. The breadth of our testing includes ICE, HEV, PHEV, BEV, FCEV powertrains and every facet of measurement and product category. AMCI Testing Certification is recognized globally as an industry gold standard.

AMCI testing是一家獨立的汽車研究公司,自1984年以來專門對汽車產品進行公正、獨家的比較評估。我們的測試範圍包括ICE、HEV、PHEV、BEV、FCEV動力系統以及測量和產品類別的各個方面。AMCI 測試認證是全球公認的行業黃金標準。

SOURCE AMCI

來源 AMCI

WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM?

想在 PRNEWSWIRE.COM 上刊登貴公司的新聞嗎?

440k+
440k+

Newsrooms &
新聞編輯室和

Influencers
有影響力的人
9k+
9k+

Digital Media
數字媒體

Outlets
網點
270k+
270k+

Journalists
記者

Opted In
選擇加入
GET STARTED
開始吧
声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論