share_log

Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 78% of the Company

Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 78% of the Company

美国基因公司(纳斯达克:AMGN)在很大程度上由机构股东控制,他们拥有公司的78%。
Simply Wall St ·  10/10 12:14

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Amgen's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 49% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 机构持有的比例极高,意味着安进的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感
  • 前25大股东拥有该公司的49%。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 78% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道谁真正控制着安进公司(纳斯达克:AMGN),那么您需要查看其股东名单的构成。持有最大股份的是机构,占比为78%。也就是说,如果股价上涨,则该机构将获益最多(或者在出现下行时损失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于他们拥有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构所有权往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者来说。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于公司往往被认为是一种令人向往的品质。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Amgen.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了安进不同所有权群体。

big
NasdaqGS:AMGN Ownership Breakdown October 10th 2024
纳斯达克:AMGN所有权拆分2024年10月10日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Amgen?

机构持股给我们关于安进的什么信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Amgen. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Amgen, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在安进拥有相当大的股份。 这表明在专业投资者中享有一定的信誉。 但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像所有人都会做的一样。 如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。 因此,值得检查安进的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。 当然,还要记住也有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NasdaqGS:AMGN Earnings and Revenue Growth October 10th 2024
纳斯达克指数安进营收和利润增长2024年10月10日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Amgen. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.7%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能会强烈影响董事会的决定。我们注意到对安进并没有投入有意义的投资的对冲基金。该公司最大的股东是耐心集团,拥有9.7%的股权。作为背景,第二大股东持有约8.6%的流通股份,第三大股东持有5.4%的股权。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。

Insider Ownership Of Amgen

安进的内部股权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Amgen Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$286m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的数据显示,内部人士在自己的名义下拥有Amgen公司不到1%的股份。规模如此之大,我们不会期望内部人士拥有大量的股票。总体而言,他们拥有价值2亿8600万美元的股票。可以说,最近的买卖行为同样重要。您可以点击这里查看内部人士是否一直在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公众-包括散户投资者-拥有该公司的 21% 的股份,因此不能轻易忽略。尽管该群体不能决定公司的方向,但它确实可以对公司的运营产生实际影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Amgen better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Amgen (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

考虑到拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得思考的。但要更好地了解安进,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,需要考虑投资风险这个永远存在的威胁。我们已经确认了安进存在4个警示信号(至少有1个有点令人不快),了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发