share_log

Institutional Investors in PPL Corporation (NYSE:PPL) Lost 3.9% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in PPL Corporation (NYSE:PPL) Lost 3.9% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

紐交所上的PPL公司機構投資者上週虧損了3.9%,但長期增長帶來了好處
Simply Wall St ·  10/11 06:24

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, PPL's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 18 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 考慮到機構持有大量股份,PPL的股價可能容易受到他們的交易決策的影響。
  • 前18大股東擁有該公司50%的所有權。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

A look at the shareholders of PPL Corporation (NYSE:PPL) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 78% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

通過查看PPL Corporation(紐交所:PPL)的股東,我們可以了解哪個群體最有權力。機構擁有78%的股份,在該公司中持有最多的股份。換句話說,該群體有可能從他們對公司的投資中獲利(或蒙受最大損失)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$23b last week. However, the 38% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上週公司市值下跌至230億美元后,機構投資者成爲受影響最大的群體。然而,股東們獲得的38%的一年回報可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但他們可能會謹慎未來的損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of PPL, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究PPL的每種股東類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:PPL Ownership Breakdown October 11th 2024
2024年10月11日紐交所:PPL所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PPL?

機構持股情況對於PPL意味着什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that PPL does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at PPL's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到PPL確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有該公司的很大一部分股票。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究過這支股票,而且他們喜歡它。但就像任何其他人一樣,他們也可能出錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某支股票的觀點,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此值得查看PPL的下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:PPL Earnings and Revenue Growth October 11th 2024
紐約證券交易所:PPL盈利和營業收入增長2024年10月11日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in PPL. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 13% of shares outstanding. With 8.0% and 4.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有超過公司一半的股份,因此他們合計可以施加重要影響力。對於PPL,對沖基金持有的股份不多。目前,The Vanguard Group公司是最大的股東,持有13%的股份。BlackRock公司和道富銀行全球貨幣管理公司分別持有8.0%和4.7%的股份,是第二大和第三大股東。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 18 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

進一步觀察股權數據,前18名股東共持有50%的所有權,這意味着沒有任何一名股東佔據多數。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of PPL

PPL公司內部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that PPL Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$20m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息顯示,PPL公司內部持股不到1%。由於這是一家非常大的公司,看到內部持股佔據公司的大部分會有點令人驚訝。儘管他們的持股不到1%,我們可以看到董事會成員共同持有價值2000萬美元的股份(以當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股份是一件好事,但也值得檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆——包括零售投資者——持有該公司22%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。雖然持有量相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand PPL better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for PPL you should be aware of, and 1 of them makes us a bit uncomfortable.

考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得思考的。但要更好地了解PPL公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。具體來說:我們已經發現了PPL公司的3個警示信號,您應該注意其中1個讓我們感覺有點不舒服。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論