Here's Why Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly
Here's Why Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that Darden Restaurants, Inc. (NYSE:DRI) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
有人認爲,作爲投資者,最好的風險考量方法是波動性,而不是債務,但禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過,「波動性遠非風險的同義詞。」因此,明智的資金知道,債務是破產時通常涉及的一個非常重要的因素,當您評估一家公司的風險時。我們注意到,達登飯店(紐交所:DRI)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但股東們應該擔心公司使用債務嗎?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來了什麼風險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
債務在企業遇到困難無法償還時,可以通過新資本或自由現金流來幫助企業。資本主義的重要組成部分是「創造性破壞」過程,失敗的企業無情地被其銀行家清算。然而,一種更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是一家公司必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東,以便控制債務。當然,債務可以是企業中的重要工具,特別是在資本密集型企業中。在考慮企業使用多少債務時,首先要做的是查看其現金和債務。
What Is Darden Restaurants's Net Debt?
達登飯店的淨債務是多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at August 2024 Darden Restaurants had debt of US$1.72b, up from US$1.62b in one year. However, it also had US$192.5m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.52b.
下面的圖像顯示,2024年8月,達登飯店的債務爲17.2億美元,比一年前的16.2億美元增加。不過,它也有1.925 億美元的現金,因此淨債務爲15.2億美元。
How Strong Is Darden Restaurants' Balance Sheet?
Darden Restaurants的資產負債表有多堅實?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Darden Restaurants had liabilities of US$2.32b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$6.89b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$192.5m and US$57.7m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$8.96b.
最近的資產負債表顯示,達登飯店一年內到期的負債爲23.2億美元,超過一年到期的負債爲68.9億美元。另一方面,其賬上現金爲1.925億美元,一年內到期的應收賬款爲5770萬美元。因此,其負債比現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和高出89.6億美元。
Darden Restaurants has a very large market capitalization of US$18.4b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
達登飯店的市值高達184億美元,因此在需要時可能很有可能籌集現金以改善其資產負債表。但我們絕對要警惕跡象,表明其債務帶來了過多的風險。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
通過查看公司的淨債務與利息、稅、折舊、攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息費用(利息覆蓋率)可以衡量一個公司的債務負擔與收益能力。因此,我們考慮將債務與有無計算折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對比。
Darden Restaurants has net debt of just 0.85 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And it boasts interest cover of 9.2 times, which is more than adequate. Also good is that Darden Restaurants grew its EBIT at 11% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Darden Restaurants can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
達登飯店的淨債務僅爲EBITDA的0.85倍,表明它絕對不是一個魯莽的借款人。而且它的利息保障倍數爲9.2倍,綽綽有餘。此外,達登飯店過去一年EBIt增長11%,進一步增強了其管理債務的能力。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的重點。但最終業務未來的盈利能力將決定達登飯店能否隨時間加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現分析師盈利預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, Darden Restaurants produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 77% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.
最後,儘管稅務人員可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冷硬現金。因此,我們總是核實EBIt中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在過去三年裏,達登飯店產生的堅實自由現金流相當於其EBIt的77%,與我們的預期相當。這筆冷硬現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, Darden Restaurants's impressive conversion of EBIT to free cash flow implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its level of total liabilities. When we consider the range of factors above, it looks like Darden Restaurants is pretty sensible with its use of debt. While that brings some risk, it can also enhance returns for shareholders. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Darden Restaurants is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
愉快地,達登飯店將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的印證表明它在債務方面佔據上風。但更值得注意的是,我們對其總負債水平感到有些擔憂。綜合考慮以上各因素,達登飯店在債務使用方面似乎相當明智。雖然這會帶來一些風險,但也能增加股東的回報。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表範圍的風險。請注意,我們的投資分析顯示達登飯店出現了3個警示信號,您應該了解...。
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
如果在所有這些之後,您更感興趣的是具有堅實資產負債表的快速增長公司,那麼不要拖延,查看我們的淨現金增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。