share_log

Tesla Cybercab Vs Uber: Can Elon Musk's Robotaxi Fleet Really Make A Dent, Gary Black Says Not So Fast

Tesla Cybercab Vs Uber: Can Elon Musk's Robotaxi Fleet Really Make A Dent, Gary Black Says Not So Fast

特斯拉Cybercab對抗Uber:埃隆·馬斯克的Robotaxi車隊真的能夠擊敗嗎?加里·布萊克表示並非那麼快
Benzinga ·  22:50

Gary Black, managing partner at Future Fund LLC, has expressed doubts about the potential of Tesla Inc.'s (NASDAQ:TSLA) proposed autonomous "Cybercab" service to outperform Uber Technologies Inc. (NYSE:UBER).

Future Fund LLC的管理合夥人Gary Black對特斯拉公司(納斯達克股票代碼:TSLA)提出的自主"Cybercab"服務超過Uber Technologies Inc.(紐約交易所股票代碼:UBER)的潛力表示懷疑。

What Happened: On Sunday, a social media user on X, formerly Twitter, argued that Tesla's Cybercab could significantly undercut Uber's cost per mile by eliminating the need for a driver.

發生了什麼:週日,社交媒體用戶在X(前身爲Twitter)上表示,特斯拉的Cybercab可以通過消除司機需求,顯着降低每英里成本以打敗Uber。

"Uber has a bigger network in the beginning but no moat is big enough to defend the $1/mile diff in pricing," the user said.

"Uber在初期擁有更大的網絡,但沒有任何築壘足以捍衛每英里1美元的定價差異," 用戶表示。

However, Black disagreed with this view, stating that Tesla's autonomous vehicles are not yet capable of performing with near-perfect reliability.

然而,Black對這一觀點持不同意見,稱特斯拉的自動駕駛汽車尚無能力以幾乎完美的可靠性執行。

He estimated that Tesla's autonomous driving systems are currently at 97% efficacy, implying that human intervention is still required for the remaining 3% of driving situations.

他估計特斯拉的自動駕駛系統目前的效能爲97%,暗示仍需要人類干預剩下的3%駕駛情況。

"Many $UBER bears seem to forget that $TSLA Cybercab can't drive at 99.99% efficacy (more like 97%), so can't eliminate the driver cost. Maybe by 2027," he stated.

"許多$UBER批評者似乎忘記了$TSLA Cybercab無法以99.99%的有效度駕駛(更接近97%),因此無法消除司機成本。也許到2027年," 他說。

Many $UBER bears seem to forget that $TSLA Cybercab can't drive at 99.99% efficacy (more like 97%), so can't eliminate the driver cost. Maybe by 2027?

— Gary Black (@garyblack00) October 14, 2024

許多$UBER批評者似乎忘記了$TSLA Cybercab無法以99.99%的有效度駕駛(更接近97%),因此無法消除司機成本。到2027年也許?

— Gary Black (@garyblack00)2024年10月14日

Why It Matters: Tesla's Cybercab, unveiled at the "We, Robot" event last week, was touted as a cost-competitive alternative to existing ride-hailing services.

爲什麼重要:特斯拉在上週的「我們,機器人」活動上推出了Cybercab,被吹捧爲現有乘車服務的具有成本競爭力的替代品。

The autonomous vehicle, priced under $30,000, left event participants awestruck with its butterfly wings that opened upwards.

這款自動駕駛車輛價格低於30,000美元,讓活動參與者驚歎不已,因爲它帶有向上打開的蝴蝶翼。

Despite the impressive design and cost advantage, analysts expressed concerns about the production timeline, hinting at a start date of sometime in 2026 or 2027 at the least.

儘管設計令人印象深刻且具有成本優勢,但分析師們對生產時間表表示擔憂,暗示最早要到2026年或2027年才能開始。

Meanwhile, Uber has been making strides in its transition to electric vehicles. The company has pledged $800 million to aid its drivers in transitioning to EVs by 2040 and is launching an AI assistant to help with EV-related queries.

與此同時,Uber正大力推進向新能源車的過渡。該公司已承諾在2040年前向其司機提供8千萬美元,幫助其過渡到新能源車,並推出人工智能助手來幫助處理有關新能源車的問題。

Uber's CEO Dara Khosrowshahi has also announced measures to ramp up the electrification of its fleet.

Uber首席執行官Dara Khosrowshahi還宣佈了加快其車隊電氣化的措施。

In September 2024, Uber and Waymo by Google parent Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) also announced a partnership to bring autonomous ride-hailing to Austin and Atlanta.

2024年9月,Uber和Google母公司Alphabet Inc.的Waymo (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL)也宣佈合作,在奧斯汀和亞特蘭大推出自動駕駛乘車服務。

Waymo is an autonomous driving technology firm that at the time had already provided more than two million rider-only trips across 13+ states in the U.S.

Waymo是一家自動駕駛技術公司,在當時已經在美國13個以上的州提供了超過兩百萬次僅限乘客的行程。

Following the CyberCab and RoboVan reveal, the consensus among Uber analysts is that while Tesla's ambitions in the autonomous vehicle space are certainly bold, they pose little immediate competitive threat.

在CyberCab和RoboVan發佈後,Uber分析師普遍認爲,儘管特斯拉在自動駕駛車領域的抱負確實大膽,但它們對競爭威脅並不即時。

  • Tesla Stock Poised To Pullback To 1-Month Low: What's Going On?
  • 特斯拉股票有望回落至1個月低點:發生了什麼?

Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of Benzinga Neuro and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

免責聲明:本內容部分使用Benzinga Neuro製作,並由Benzinga編輯審核和發佈。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論