Keeson Technology Corporation Limited's (SHSE:603610) Financials Are Too Obscure To Link With Current Share Price Momentum: What's In Store For the Stock?
Keeson Technology Corporation Limited's (SHSE:603610) Financials Are Too Obscure To Link With Current Share Price Momentum: What's In Store For the Stock?
Keeson Technology (SHSE:603610) has had a great run on the share market with its stock up by a significant 17% over the last month. However, we wonder if the company's inconsistent financials would have any adverse impact on the current share price momentum. In this article, we decided to focus on Keeson Technology's ROE.
Keeson Technology (603610.SH)股票在股市表現出色,過去一個月上漲了顯著的17%。然而,我們擔心公司不穩定的財務狀況是否會對當前股價勢頭產生不利影響。在本文中,我們決定關注Keeson Technology的roe。
Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.
股東權益回報率(ROE)是檢驗公司增加其價值和管理投資者資金有效性的測試。簡而言之,ROE顯示每個美元的利潤與其股東的投資有關。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
怎樣計算ROE?
The formula for return on equity is:
權益回報率的計算公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Keeson Technology is:
所以,根據上述公式,Keeson Technology的roe爲:
5.6% = CN¥168m ÷ CN¥3.0b (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
5.6% = 16800萬人民幣 ÷ 30億人民幣(截至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the yearly profit. Another way to think of that is that for every CN¥1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn CN¥0.06 in profit.
「回報」即年利潤。另一種思考方法是,每增加1元人民幣的權益,該公司就能賺取0.06元人民幣的利潤。
Why Is ROE Important For Earnings Growth?
ROE爲什麼對淨利潤增長很重要?
Thus far, we have learned that ROE measures how efficiently a company is generating its profits. Based on how much of its profits the company chooses to reinvest or "retain", we are then able to evaluate a company's future ability to generate profits. Assuming everything else remains unchanged, the higher the ROE and profit retention, the higher the growth rate of a company compared to companies that don't necessarily bear these characteristics.
到目前爲止,我們已經知道ROE測量公司如何高效地生成利潤。基於公司選擇重新投資或「保留」其利潤的比例,我們能夠評估公司未來生成利潤的能力。假設其他所有因素保持不變,則ROE和利潤保留率越高,公司的增長率也越高,與不一定具備這些特徵的公司相比。
A Side By Side comparison of Keeson Technology's Earnings Growth And 5.6% ROE
Keeson Technology的收益增長和5.6%的roe的並排比較
When you first look at it, Keeson Technology's ROE doesn't look that attractive. We then compared the company's ROE to the broader industry and were disappointed to see that the ROE is lower than the industry average of 10%. Therefore, it might not be wrong to say that the five year net income decline of 22% seen by Keeson Technology was probably the result of it having a lower ROE. However, there could also be other factors causing the earnings to decline. For example, it is possible that the business has allocated capital poorly or that the company has a very high payout ratio.
當您首次查看時,Keeson Technology的roe看起來並不那麼吸引人。我們隨後將公司roe與更廣泛的行業進行了比較,令人失望的是發現roe低於10%的行業平均水平。因此,可以說Keeson Technology五年淨利潤下降22%可能是roe較低的結果。然而,導致收益下降可能還有其他因素。例如,業務可能配置資本不當,或者公司的派息比率非常高。
That being said, we compared Keeson Technology's performance with the industry and were concerned when we found that while the company has shrunk its earnings, the industry has grown its earnings at a rate of 7.3% in the same 5-year period.
話雖如此,我們將Keeson Technology的表現與行業進行了比較,當我們發現公司收益萎縮而行業在同一5年期間的增長率爲7.3%時,我們感到擔憂。
The basis for attaching value to a company is, to a great extent, tied to its earnings growth. The investor should try to establish if the expected growth or decline in earnings, whichever the case may be, is priced in. Doing so will help them establish if the stock's future looks promising or ominous. Is Keeson Technology fairly valued compared to other companies? These 3 valuation measures might help you decide.
對一家公司進行估值的基礎,在很大程度上與其盈利增長有關。投資者應該盡力確定預期盈利增長或下降是否已經定價。這樣做將有助於他們確定股票的未來是看好還是令人憂慮。與其他公司相比,Keeson Technology是否定價合理?這3個估值指標可能會幫助您做出決定。
Is Keeson Technology Efficiently Re-investing Its Profits?
Keeson Technology是否高效地再投資利潤?
In spite of a normal three-year median payout ratio of 37% (that is, a retention ratio of 63%), the fact that Keeson Technology's earnings have shrunk is quite puzzling. So there might be other factors at play here which could potentially be hampering growth. For example, the business has faced some headwinds.
儘管通常的三年中位數股利支付比率爲37%(即留存比率爲63%),但Keeson Technology的盈利收縮情況相當令人困惑。因此,可能存在其他因素影響增長。例如,該業務遇到了一些逆風。
In addition, Keeson Technology has been paying dividends over a period of four years suggesting that keeping up dividend payments is preferred by the management even though earnings have been in decline.
此外,Keeson Technology已連續四年支付股息,表明管理層更願意維持股息支付,即使盈利在下降。
Summary
總的來說,我們對偉明環保的表現非常滿意。具體而言,我們喜歡公司以高回報率再投資了其利潤的很大一部分。當然,這導致公司的收益大幅增長。但是,最新的行業分析師預測表明,該公司的收益預計將加速增長。
Overall, we have mixed feelings about Keeson Technology. While the company does have a high rate of reinvestment, the low ROE means that all that reinvestment is not reaping any benefit to its investors, and moreover, its having a negative impact on the earnings growth. Having said that, looking at current analyst estimates, we found that the company's earnings growth rate is expected to see a huge improvement. To know more about the company's future earnings growth forecasts take a look at this free report on analyst forecasts for the company to find out more.
總體而言,我們對科信科技有着複雜的感受。雖然公司具有高比率的再投資,但低ROE意味着所有這些再投資並未給投資人帶來任何好處,而且,對收益增長也產生了負面影響。話雖如此,看着目前分析師的估計,我們發現公司的收益增長率預計將有巨大提升。要了解更多關於公司未來收益增長預測的信息,請查閱分析師對該公司的預測的免費報告。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。