Xianheng International Science&Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:605056) 24% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Private Companies Who Own 48% as Well as Insiders
Xianheng International Science&Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:605056) 24% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Private Companies Who Own 48% as Well as Insiders
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in Xianheng International Science&Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- Insider ownership in Xianheng International Science&Technology is 23%
- 私營企業在鮮衡國際科技中擁有相當大的所有權,這表明他們在管理和業務策略上有更大的發言權
- 業務的52%由前4大股東持有。
- 鮮衡國際科技的內部所有權爲23%
Every investor in Xianheng International Science&Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:605056) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 48% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
鮮衡國際科技股份有限公司(SHSE:605056)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。持有最大股份的是私營企業,佔48%。也就是說,如果股價上漲(或者出現下行),這個群體將獲益最多(或者損失最多)。
Following a 24% increase in the stock price last week, private companies profited the most, but insiders who own 23% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
上週股價上漲24%,私人公司獲利最多,但擁有23%股份的內部人士也從漲幅中獲益。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Xianheng International Science&Technology.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注仙恒國際科技的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Xianheng International Science&Technology?
機構持股告訴我們有關仙恒國際科技的什麼信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Xianheng International Science&Technology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Xianheng International Science&Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在仙恒國際科技中持有相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中享有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會做出一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對某股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的仙恒國際科技的歷史收入。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Xianheng International Science&Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Laixing Wang with 20% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 8.4% of the stock.
我們注意到對Xianheng International Science&Technology,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是Laixing Wang,持有20%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約15%和8.4%的股票。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒來了解風向也是有意義的。雖然有些股票受到分析師的關注,但該公司可能並未受到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在路上獲得更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Xianheng International Science&Technology
Xianheng International Science&Technology的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Xianheng International Science&Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.6b, and insiders have CN¥1.3b worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在咸亨國際科技有限公司保持着重要持股。其市值僅爲56億人民幣,內部人士名下擁有價值13億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍持有大量股份。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆——包括零售投資者——持有該公司22%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。雖然持有量相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 48%, of the Xianheng International Science&Technology stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
似乎有48%的閒恒國際科技股票是由私人公司擁有的。或許值得進一步研究。如果相關方,比如內部人士,對其中一傢俬人公司感興趣,那應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Xianheng International Science&Technology is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同團體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,閒恒國際科技在我們的投資分析中顯示了3個警示信號,您應該了解...
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。