Individual Investors Among Dingdong (Cayman) Limited's (NYSE:DDL) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 10% Price Drop
Individual Investors Among Dingdong (Cayman) Limited's (NYSE:DDL) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 10% Price Drop
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Dingdong (Cayman) by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Insiders own 28% of Dingdong (Cayman)
- 个人投资者对叮咚买菜(开曼)具有重要控制权,这意味着普通大众有更多影响管理和治理决策的权力
- 总共有5位投资者拥有该公司的52%股权。
- 内部人拥有叮咚买菜(开曼)28%的股份
If you want to know who really controls Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (NYSE:DDL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 34% to be precise, is individual investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想了解谁真正控制着叮咚买菜(纽交所:DDL)有限公司,那么您就需要看看它的股东登记簿的构成。 在公司中持有最多股份的是个人投资者,准确地说约占公司股份的34%。 换句话说,如果股价上涨,该群体将获益最多(或者在股市下跌时损失最大)。
Following a 10% decrease in the stock price last week, individual investors suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 28% stock also took a hit.
上周股价下跌10%,个人投资者遭受了最大损失,但持有28%股票的内部人员也受到了打击。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Dingdong (Cayman), beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究叮咚买菜(开曼)的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dingdong (Cayman)?
机构持股告诉我们关于叮咚买菜(开曼)的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
Dingdong (Cayman) already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Dingdong (Cayman)'s earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
叮咚买菜(开曼)已经有机构在股东名册上。事实上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这可能意味着公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。但最好要警惕依赖所谓的机构投资者的认可。他们有时也会搞错。如果多家机构同时改变他们对某只股票的观点,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得查看一下叮咚买菜(开曼)的历史收入记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

Dingdong (Cayman) is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Liang Changlin is the largest shareholder with 28% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.4% and 6.0% of the stock.
叮咚买菜(开曼)不是由对冲基金持有。该公司的CEO梁长林是最大的股东,持有28%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约6.4%和6.0%的股份。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 52% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我们的研究还揭示了一个事实,即约52%的公司由前5名股东控制,这表明这些所有者对业务具有重大影响力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Dingdong (Cayman)
叮咚买菜(开曼)的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Dingdong (Cayman) Limited. It has a market capitalization of just US$667m, and insiders have US$188m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的信息显示,内部人员在叮咚买菜(开曼)有着重要的持股。它的市值只有66700万美元,而内部人员名下大约有18800万美元的股份。看到内部人员这么投入业务是很好的。也许值得检查一下这些内部人员最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Dingdong (Cayman). This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众拥有公司34%的股份,主要由个体投资者构成,对叮咚买菜(开曼)具有一定程度的影响力。虽然持股比例相当大,但如果决定与其他大股东不一致,可能无法改变公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With a stake of 22%, private equity firms could influence the Dingdong (Cayman) board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
持有22%股份的股权投资公司可能会影响叮咚买菜(开曼)董事会。有些人可能喜欢这样,因为股权投资有时是激进分子,追究管理层的责任。但另一些时候,股权投资却卖掉了,导致公司走向公开市场。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Dingdong (Cayman) better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Dingdong (Cayman) that you should be aware of before investing here.
始终值得考虑公司股东的不同群体。但要更好地了解叮咚买菜(开曼),我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了叮咚买菜(开曼)2个警示信号,您在进行投资之前应该注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。