Retail Investors Among Gemdale Corporation's (SHSE:600383) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 3.9% Price Drop
Retail Investors Among Gemdale Corporation's (SHSE:600383) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 3.9% Price Drop
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Gemdale indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 11 shareholders own 51% of the company
- 23% of Gemdale is held by Institutions
- 金地集团零售投资者拥有相当多的持股,这意味着他们在管理和业务策略上拥有更大的发言权。
- 前11大股东拥有该公司51%的股份。
- 机构持有金地集团23%的股份
A look at the shareholders of Gemdale Corporation (SHSE:600383) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 43% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下金地集团(SHSE:600383)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权势。零售投资者持有该公司的43%股份,换句话说,该群体在公司投资中有着最大的收益(或损失)可能。
As market cap fell to CN¥26b last week, retail investors would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
市值上周下降至260亿人民币,零售投资者面临的损失比该公司的任何其他股东群体都要高。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Gemdale, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解金地集团的每种所有者类型,首先从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Gemdale?
机构持股在金地集团中扮演了什么样的角色?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
We can see that Gemdale does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Gemdale's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到金地确实有机构投资者; 他们持有公司股票的很大一部分。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票,并且他们喜欢。但就像任何其他人一样,他们可能是错误的。 如果多家机构同时改变对某支股票的看法,则该股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得看看下面的金地收入历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Gemdale. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is FunDe Sino Life Insurance Co., Ltd. with 22% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.8% by the third-largest shareholder.
我们注意到,对金地集团没有有意义的投资的对冲基金。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是富德中英人寿保险有限公司,持有22%的股份。为了更好地理解,第二大股东持有约8.1%的股份,紧随其后的第三大股东拥有7.8%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股东注册表,我们可以看到前11大股东控制着该公司51%的股权,这意味着没有单一的股东拥有多数股权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Gemdale
金地集团内部股权占比情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Gemdale Corporation in their own names. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥74m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的数据显示,金地集团的内部持有不到1%的股份。然而,内部人士可能通过更复杂的结构拥有间接利益。这是一家相当大的公司,董事会成员可能拥有对公司具有重要利益的股份,而不拥有相对较大比例的股份。在这种情况下,他们目前持有价值约7400万人民币的股份(按当前价格计算)。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样重要。您可以单击此处查看内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 43% stake in Gemdale. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在金地集团持有43%的股份。尽管持股比例相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能无法改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 34%, of the Gemdale stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
金地集团的34%股权似乎归私人公司所有。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,所以值得深入研究拥有这些私人公司的人。有时内部人员或其他相关方可能通过另一个私人公司持有公共公司股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Gemdale (including 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) .
我发现查看公司股权的真正所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,您应该了解我们在金地集团发现的2个警示信号(其中有1个我们不太满意)。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。