Focus Lightings Tech Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300708) 11% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Individual Investors Who Own 57% as Well as Insiders
Focus Lightings Tech Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300708) 11% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Individual Investors Who Own 57% as Well as Insiders
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Focus Lightings Tech by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 43% of the company
- 38% of Focus Lightings Tech is held by insiders
- 個人投資者對聚燦光電擁有重要控制權意味着普通公衆擁有更多影響管理和治理決策的權力
- 前25名股東擁有公司43%的股份。
- 38%的Focus Lightings Tech股票由內部人持有
Every investor in Focus Lightings Tech Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300708) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
SZSE:300708的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有最大股份的是擁有57%所有權的個人投資者群體。換句話說,該群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。
While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 11% price gain, insiders also received a 38% cut.
儘管上週股價上漲11%,個人投資者是收益最多的群體,內部人員也獲得了38%的分成。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Focus Lightings Tech.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關聚燦光電的什麼信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Focus Lightings Tech?
機構持股告訴我們關於聚燦光電的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Since institutions own only a small portion of Focus Lightings Tech, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.
由於機構僅擁有聚燦光電的一小部分股份,許多人可能沒有花太多時間考慮這支股票。但顯而易見,有些人確實關注過;他們喜歡這支股票,並且已經買入。因此,如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移得到改善,我們很可能會在未來看到更多的機構買家。如果多個機構投資者同時試圖買入一支股票,那麼看到股價大幅上漲並不罕見。因此,請查看下方的歷史收益軌跡,但請記住未來才是最重要的。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Focus Lightings Tech. Our data shows that Hua Rong Pan is the largest shareholder with 33% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 2.9% and 1.7% of the stock.
對聚燦光電來說,對沖基金持有的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,華融盤是最大的股東,持有33%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約2.9%和1.7%的股份。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Focus Lightings Tech
聚燦光電的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Focus Lightings Tech Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥3.0b worth of shares in the CN¥7.8b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在聚燦光電股份有限公司擁有大量股份。內部人士在這家市值 ¥78億 的公司中擁有 ¥30億的股份。這相當有意義。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望查看這份免費圖表,顯示內部人員最近的交易。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 57% stake in Focus Lightings Tech, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
一般公衆(通常是個人投資者)在聚燦光電科技中持有57%的股份,表明這是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權水平賦予更廣泛的公衆投資者一定能力來影響關鍵政策決策,如董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付比率。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Focus Lightings Tech that you should be aware of.
雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經找到了聚燦光電的2個警示信號,您應該意識到。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。