Xingyuan Environment Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300266) Market Cap Rose CN¥497m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 53% Profited and so Did Insiders
Xingyuan Environment Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300266) Market Cap Rose CN¥497m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 53% Profited and so Did Insiders
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Xingyuan Environment Technology by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 47% of the business is held by the top 22 shareholders
- 24% of Xingyuan Environment Technology is held by insiders
- 个人投资者对兴源环境科技具有重要控制权,这意味着普通公众更有权利影响管理和治理相关决策。
- 前22名股东持有47%的业务。
- 兴源环境科技24%的股份由内部人员持有。
Every investor in Xingyuan Environment Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300266) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 53% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
深圳兴源环境科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300266)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。那就是拥有公司股份最多的群体,大约占53%,即个人投资者。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
While individual investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's CN¥497m market cap gain, insiders too had a 24% share in those profits.
尽管个体投资者是上周人民币49700万市值增长中受益最多的群体,内部人士也在这些利润中占有24%的份额。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Xingyuan Environment Technology, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解兴源环境科技的每一种所有者,从下面的图表开始。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb718/eb718d1d141a6b803868378c85c16a914a2a73b8" alt="big"
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Xingyuan Environment Technology?
机构持股能告诉我们有关兴源环境科技的什么信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
Xingyuan Environment Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Xingyuan Environment Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
兴源环境科技已经吸引了机构进入股东名册。事实上,他们在公司中拥有一个可观的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依赖这个事实,因为机构有时也会犯错误,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构拥有一只股票,那么它们总会面临“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能竞相快速抛售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险就更高。您可以查看兴源环境科技的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更加丰富多彩的。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c24b/3c24b8384cd664f67392f14ff8498c60f26354b0" alt="big"
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Xingyuan Environment Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Yonghao Liu with 24% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 4.5% of the stock.
对于兴源环境科技,对冲基金的股份比较少。从我们的数据来看,最大股东是刘永浩,持有24%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约10%和4.5%的股票。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 22 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
经过研究我们的所有权数据,我们发现前22名股东共同拥有不到50%的股权登记,这意味着没有单个个人拥有多数利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但还是研究分析师的建议,以深入了解股票预期表现,是一个好习惯。就我们所知,该公司没有分析师覆盖,因此可能没有引起注意。
Insider Ownership Of Xingyuan Environment Technology
兴源环境科技内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Xingyuan Environment Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥900m stake in this CN¥3.8b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起来内部持有兴源环境科技有限公司相当大比例的股份。 内部人士在这家38亿人民币的业务中持有90000万元人民币的股份。看到内部人士如此投资该业务真是太好了。也许值得检查一下这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 53% of Xingyuan Environment Technology. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
一般公众,包括零售投资者在兴源环境科技中占53%。拥有这么多的股权,零售投资者可以共同在影响股东回报的决策中发挥作用,比如股利政策和董事任命。他们还可以行使权力对可能不会提高盈利能力的收购或合并进行投票。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Xingyuan Environment Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Xingyuan Environment Technology is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those can't be ignored...
始终值得考虑不同的持股群体。但要更好地了解兴源环境,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,兴源环境在我们的投资分析中出现了2个警示信号,其中1个不能被忽视...
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
当然,您可能会在其他地方找到一项出色的投资。因此,请查看此免费的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。