While Individual Investors Own 34% of 360 Security Technology Inc. (SHSE:601360), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 47% Ownership
While Individual Investors Own 34% of 360 Security Technology Inc. (SHSE:601360), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 47% Ownership
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in 360 Security Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
- 12% of 360 Security Technology is held by insiders
- 私营公司对360安防科技的重要持股表明他们共同在管理和业务策略上拥有更大发言权
- 总共有2家投资者持有该公司53%的所有权。
- 360安防科技的12%股份由内部持有人持有
If you want to know who really controls 360 Security Technology Inc. (SHSE:601360), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 47% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁实际控制着360安防科技公司(SHSE:601360),那么你需要看一下其股份登记簿的构成。持有最大股份的是私营公司,拥有47%的所有权。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该集团将获益最多(或者如果出现下跌,将损失最重)。
Meanwhile, individual investors make up 34% of the company's shareholders.
个人投资者持有该公司34%的股份。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of 360 Security Technology, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解360安全科技每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About 360 Security Technology?
机构持有权告诉我们什么关于360安全科技?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in 360 Security Technology. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of 360 Security Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在360安全科技中持有相当大的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好不要过分依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会出错。如果两个大型机构投资者在同一时间尝试抛售一支股票,很常见会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查360安全科技过去的盈利轨迹,(如下)。当然,也要记得有其他因素需要考虑。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in 360 Security Technology. Tianjin Qixin Tongda Technology Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 47% of shares outstanding. Huan Hu is the second largest shareholder owning 6.4% of common stock, and Hongyi Zhou holds about 5.4% of the company stock. Hongyi Zhou, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
对360安全科技来说,对冲基金持有的股份不多。天津启新通达科技有限公司是该公司当前最大的股东,持有47%的流通股。胡欢是第二大股东,拥有6.4%的普通股,周弘毅持有约5.4%的公司股份。第三大股东周弘毅也恰好担任董事会主席。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
经过进一步挖掘,我们发现前两个股东共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,说明他们有相当大的影响力来影响公司的决策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of 360 Security Technology
360安全科技的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of 360 Security Technology Inc.. Insiders own CN¥7.1b worth of shares in the CN¥60b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看起来内部持有的安防-半导体股份科技公司相当大。 内部持有价值71亿人民币的股票,占据该公司600亿人民币的股份。 这非常重要。 大多数人会说,这显示了与股东的高度一致,尤其是在这样规模的公司。 您可以点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 34% stake in 360 Security Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
通常是零售投资者的普通公众持有安防-半导体科技公司34%的股份。 尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以改变他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 47%, of the 360 Security Technology stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
据悉,私营公司拥有360安防-半导体47%的股份。单凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,所以值得进一步了解拥有这些私营公司的所有人。有时内部人员或其他相关方可能通过另一个独立的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand 360 Security Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that 360 Security Technology is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
考虑到不同的股东群体总是值得的。但要更好地了解360安防-半导体,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,在我们的投资分析中,360安防-半导体显示了1个警示信号,你应该了解...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。