share_log

With 68% Institutional Ownership, Cincinnati Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CINF) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 68% Institutional Ownership, Cincinnati Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CINF) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

拥有68%的机构持股,辛辛纳提金融公司(纳斯达克股票代码:CINF)是大户们的最爱。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/10/28 18:42

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Cincinnati Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 48% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 机构在辛辛纳提金融的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价有重大影响
  • 共有25位投资者拥有这家公司48%的所有权。
  • 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。

Every investor in Cincinnati Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CINF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 68% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

辛辛纳提金融公司(纳斯达克股票代码:CINF)的每位投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。 这家公司持有最多股份的群体,准确地说约占公司股份的68%,是机构。 换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考虑到机构持有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构投资者投资公司的大量资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Cincinnati Financial.

让我们仔细看看,不同类型的股东可以告诉我们有关辛辛纳提金融的什么。

big
NasdaqGS:CINF Ownership Breakdown October 28th 2024
NasdaqGS:CINF所有权拆分2024年10月28日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cincinnati Financial?

机构所有权告诉我们有关辛辛纳提金融的什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that Cincinnati Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cincinnati Financial, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,辛辛纳提金融确实有机构投资者; 他们持有该公司的大部分股票。 这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。 但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为有时机构也会做出错误的投资,就像其他人一样。 如果两个大型机构投资者尝试同时抛售一只股票,很常见看到股价大幅下跌。 因此,值得检查辛辛纳提金融的过去收益轨迹(下文)。 当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NasdaqGS:CINF Earnings and Revenue Growth October 28th 2024
纳斯达克GS:辛辛纳提金融公司2024年10月28日的盈利和营业收入增长

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Cincinnati Financial is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.9% and 5.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以集体行使重要的影响力。辛辛纳提金融公司不受对冲基金的持有。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是公司最大的股东,持有公司12%的股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有公司未流通股份的7.9%和5.8%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Cincinnati Financial

辛辛纳提金融公司的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Cincinnati Financial Corporation. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$392m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我们可以看到内部股东持有辛辛纳提金融公司的股份。这是一家非常庞大的公司,董事会成员共持有价值39200万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。我们有时会对他们是在买入还是卖出感兴趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 30% stake in Cincinnati Financial. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般大众,通常是个人投资者,在辛辛纳提金融持有30%的股份。尽管这一所有权规模可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Cincinnati Financial has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

我觉得查看公司的具体股东非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例 - 辛辛纳提金融有 1 个警告标志 我们认为你应该注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发