Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of Coastal Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CCB) Gained 7.8%, Institutions Profited as Well
Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of Coastal Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CCB) Gained 7.8%, Institutions Profited as Well
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Coastal Financial by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 45% of the company
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 個人投資者對Coastal Financial擁有重大控制權,意味着普通公衆有更多權力影響管理和治理相關決策
- 前25名股東擁有該公司的45%股份。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
A look at the shareholders of Coastal Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CCB) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看下Coastal Financial Corporation (納斯達克:建設銀行) 的股東,可以告訴我們哪一組最具影響力。 公司持有股份最多的是個人投資者,佔公司股份約54%,換句話說,該組面臨着最大的上升潛力(或下行風險)。
Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched US$787m last week, while institutions who own 28% also benefitted.
上週市值觸及78700萬美元后,個人投資者獲利最多,同時擁有28%的機構也受益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Coastal Financial, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解Coastal Financial每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Coastal Financial?
機構所有權告訴我們關於coastal financial的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Coastal Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Coastal Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到coastal financial確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的股份。 這意味着那些機構的分析師已經看過這支股票,而且他們喜歡它。 但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。 如果多個機構同時改變他們對一支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。 因此,值得查看下面的coastal financial的收入歷史記錄。 當然,未來才是真正重要的。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Coastal Financial. Steven Hovde is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.3% and 4.6% of the stock. In addition, we found that Eric Sprink, the CEO has 1.0% of the shares allocated to their name.
我們注意到對海岸金融的投資基金並不重要。Steven Hovde目前是公司最大的股東,持有13%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.3%和4.6%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官Eric Sprink名下持有1.0%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Coastal Financial
海岸金融的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Coastal Financial Corporation. Insiders have a US$145m stake in this US$787m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有人持有海岸金融公司合理比例的股份。內部持有人在這家總市值爲78700萬美元的企業中持有14500萬美元的股份。看到內部持有人如此投入業務是件好事。也許值得看看這些內部持有人最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 54% of Coastal Financial shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,共同持有海岸金融股份的54%。憑藉這種所有權,零售投資者可以共同在影響股東回報的決策中發揮作用,比如股利政策和董事的任命。他們也可以行使權力投票表決那些可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Coastal Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Coastal Financial , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
考慮到持有公司股票的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解coastal financial,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如,要考慮到投資風險這個常見的陰影。我們已經發現了1個關於coastal financial的警示信號,了解這些應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。