Private Companies Account for 52% of ANTA Sports Products Limited's (HKG:2020) Ownership, While Individual Investors Account for 31%
Private Companies Account for 52% of ANTA Sports Products Limited's (HKG:2020) Ownership, While Individual Investors Account for 31%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over ANTA Sports Products by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Institutional ownership in ANTA Sports Products is 16%
- 私人公司對安踏體育產品的重要控制意味着普通公衆更有能力影響管理和治理決策
- 總共有2個投資者掌握了該公司52%的所有權。
- 安踏體育產品的機構持有比例爲16%
To get a sense of who is truly in control of ANTA Sports Products Limited (HKG:2020), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着安踏體育產品有限公司(HKG:2020),了解企業的所有權結構是很重要的。我們可以看到私人公司擁有公司中的大部分股份,佔有52%的股權。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或者如果出現下行),該集團將獲益最大(或者損失最大)。
Meanwhile, individual investors make up 31% of the company's shareholders.
與此同時,個人投資者佔據公司股東的31%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about ANTA Sports Products.
讓我們仔細看看,不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於安踏體育產品的情況。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ANTA Sports Products?
機構所有權告訴我們有關ANTA Sports產品的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
ANTA Sports Products already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at ANTA Sports Products' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
ANTA Sports產品已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅憑這個事實來判斷,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看看ANTA Sports產品的歷史收入情況。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
ANTA Sports Products is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Anta International Group Holdings Ltd., with ownership of 42%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 1.8% by the third-largest shareholder.
安踏體育產品未被對沖基金持有。該公司最大股東是安踏國際集團控股有限公司,持股比例爲42%。第二大股東持有約9.8%的流通股,第三大股東持有1.8%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of ANTA Sports Products
安踏體育產品的內部人持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of ANTA Sports Products Limited in their own names. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own HK$1.1b worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據顯示,ANTA體育產品有限公司的內部持有人僅以自己的名義擁有不足1%的股份。但是,內部持有人可能通過更復雜的結構間接持有利益。作爲一家大公司,我們只會期望內部持有人持有其很小的一部分股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值11億港元的股票。看到內部持有至少一些股份總是件好事,但值得檢查這些內部持有人是否一直在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in ANTA Sports Products. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在ANTA體育產品中持有31%的股份。雖然這個群體不能一定決定事情,但確實可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 52%, of the ANTA Sports Products stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
看起來,私營公司擁有安踏體育產品股票的52%。也許值得深入了解一下。如果相關方,如內部人員,在其中一傢俬營公司中有利益,這應在年度報告中披露。私營公司可能也對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。