Individual Investors Among China Water Affairs Group Limited's (HKG:855) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 5.6% Price Drop
Individual Investors Among China Water Affairs Group Limited's (HKG:855) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 5.6% Price Drop
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in China Water Affairs Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 中国水务集团中个人投资者持有的大量股份表明,他们共同在管理和业务策略方面具有更大的发言权
- 该公司总计有4位投资者持有大部分股份,占有52%的所有权。
- 最近由内部人士出售。
Every investor in China Water Affairs Group Limited (HKG:855) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 32% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
中国水务集团有限公司(HKG:855)的每位投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。在该公司中持有最多股份的群体,大约占公司股份的32%,精确到数字,是个人投资者。换句话说,该群体面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
While the holdings of individual investors took a hit after last week's 5.6% price drop, insiders with their 31% also suffered.
尽管上周股价下跌了5.6%,个人投资者的持有份额受到了打击,但持有31%的内部人员也遭受了损失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of China Water Affairs Group, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究中国水务集团的每一种所有者类型,从以下图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Water Affairs Group?
机构持股告诉我们关于中国水务集团的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
China Water Affairs Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of China Water Affairs Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
中国水务集团已经有机构列入股东名册。事实上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的可信度。但不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像所有人一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时尝试大量抛售股票,很可能会看到股价大幅下跌。因此值得检查中国水务集团的过去收益轨迹(以下)。当然,还要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
China Water Affairs Group is not owned by hedge funds. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In China Water Affairs Group's case, its Top Key Executive, Chuan Liang Duan, is the largest shareholder, holding 27% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 18% and 4.5% of the stock.
中国水务集团并非由对冲基金拥有。因为行动胜于言辞,所以当内部股东在一家公司拥有重要股权时,我们认为这是一个好迹象。在中国水务集团的情况下,其最高管理者段传亮是最大的股东,持有公司已发行股份的27%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约18%和4.5%的股份。
On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
进一步观察发现,前四名股东持有52%的股份。换句话说,这些股东对该公司的决策有重要的发言权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以加深对股票预期表现的全面了解也是一个好习惯。虽然有部分分析师的覆盖,但该公司可能没有受到广泛的关注。因此,在未来可能会受到更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of China Water Affairs Group
中国水务集团的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of China Water Affairs Group Limited. It has a market capitalization of just HK$7.7b, and insiders have HK$2.4b worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
内部人士拥有中国水务集团有限公司相当大比例的股份。其市值仅为77亿港元,内部人士以24亿港元的股份持有。这可能表明创始人仍持有大量股份。您可以点击这里查看他们是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 32% stake in China Water Affairs Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在中国水务集团持有32%的股份。尽管这个所有权比例可能不足以左右政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
Public companies currently own 18% of China Water Affairs Group stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
目前公开公司持有中国水务集团18%的股份。 这可能是一种战略利益,这两家公司可能存在相关业务利益。 可能它们已经分拆。 这个持有可能值得进一步调查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with China Water Affairs Group (including 1 which is significant) .
我发现查看公司实际所有者非常有趣。 但为了真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 为此,您应该了解中国水务集团存在的3个警示标志(包括1个重要标志)。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。