IRay Technology Company Limited's (SHSE:688301) Largest Shareholders Are Private Companies With 42% Ownership, Institutions Own 37%
IRay Technology Company Limited's (SHSE:688301) Largest Shareholders Are Private Companies With 42% Ownership, Institutions Own 37%
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in iRay Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Institutional ownership in iRay Technology is 37%
- 私营公司对奕瑞科技的相当大股权表明它们共同在管理和业务策略上拥有更大的发言权
- 共有7家投资者拥有该公司的51%所有权。
- 奕瑞科技的机构所有权为37%
A look at the shareholders of iRay Technology Company Limited (SHSE:688301) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 42% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
观察奕瑞科技有限公司(SHSE:688301)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个集团最具影响力。私营公司持有42%的股份,是公司中持股最多的集团。也就是说,如果股价上涨(或者如果出现下行),该集团将获得最大利益(或者损失最大)。
Institutions, on the other hand, account for 37% of the company's stockholders. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies.
另一方面,机构占公司股东的37%。大公司通常有机构作为股东,而在较小的公司中,我们通常看到内部人拥有股份。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about iRay Technology.
让我们更仔细地看一下,看看不同类型的股东对奕瑞科技有何启示。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About iRay Technology?
机构持股告诉我们什么关于奕瑞科技?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that iRay Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of iRay Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,奕瑞科技确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司的很大一部分股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资决策,就像其他人一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,很常见会出现股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查奕瑞科技的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in iRay Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shanghai Yiyuan Herui Investment Consulting Co., Ltd. with 16% of shares outstanding. With 9.9% and 6.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, Shanghai Heyi Investment Management Co., Ltd. and HongShan are the second and third largest shareholders.
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in iRay Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shanghai Yiyuan Herui Investment Consulting Co., Ltd. with 16% of shares outstanding. With 9.9% and 6.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, Shanghai Heyi Investment Management Co., Ltd. and HongShan are the second and third largest shareholders.
We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进行了更深入的挖掘,发现前7名股东持有大约51%的股份,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。
Insider Ownership Of iRay Technology
Insider Ownership Of iRay Technology
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our information suggests that iRay Technology Company Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥11m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的信息显示,奕瑞科技股份有限公司的内部持有人拥有公司不到1%的股份。但值得注意的是,内部持有人可能通过私人公司或其他公司结构间接持有利益。作为一家相对庞大的公司,董事会成员可能持有公司的实质性利益,而并非持有较大比例的权益。在这种情况下,他们持有约1100万元人民币的股份(按当前价格计算)。看到至少有一些内部持有人总是件好事,但值得注意的是是否这些内部人士一直在抛售。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in iRay Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公众,通常是个人投资者,在奕瑞科技拥有15%的股份。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以左右政策决策偏向他们,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
Private equity firms hold a 6.6% stake in iRay Technology. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
股权投资机构持有奕瑞科技6.6%的股份。这表明他们在关键政策决策方面可能具有影响力。一些投资者可能会因此感到鼓舞,因为股权投资有时能够鼓励实施能帮助市场认识到公司价值的策略。另一方面,这些持有者可能在公司上市后退出投资。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 42%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据显示,私人公司持有该公司42%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,所以值得调查一下谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人员或其他相关方可能通过独立的私人公司持有公众公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand iRay Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with iRay Technology (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
考虑到拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但要更好地了解奕瑞科技,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。比如,始终存在的投资风险。我们已经确定了奕瑞科技的3个警告信号(至少有1个让我们有些不舒服),了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。