Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE:WBS) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%
Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE:WBS) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Webster Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 机构对韦伯斯特金融的大量持股意味着它们对公司股价有着重要影响
- 共有13个投资者拥有该公司的大多数股份,持股比例为50%。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
If you want to know who really controls Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE:WBS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 87% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果您想知道谁真正控制着韦伯斯特金融公司(纽交所:WBS),那么您需要看一看其股东登记表。机构持有公司87%的股份,拥有最多的股份。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
因为机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往带有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者来说。因此,机构投资在一家公司中的大量资金通常被视为一个积极因素。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Webster Financial.
在下面的图表中,我们放大查看韦伯斯特金融的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Webster Financial?
机构所有权能告诉我们有关韦伯斯特金融的什么信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Webster Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Webster Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
韦伯斯特金融已经有机构持有股份。事实上,它们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经查看了这支股票,并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能出错。如果多家机构同时改变他们对某支股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得查看韦伯斯特金融的下面的营收历史数据。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Webster Financial. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.0% of common stock, and FMR LLC holds about 5.1% of the company stock.
机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此他们可以共同影响董事会的决定。对于韦伯斯特金融,对冲基金持有的股份并不多。该公司最大的股东是万得集团,持有公司11%的股份。黑石集团持有9.0%的普通股,而FMR LLC持有公司5.1%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
通过股权调查,我们发现前13名股东在公司中拥有50%的股权,表明没有单一股东对该公司具有重大控制权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Webster Financial
韦伯斯特金融的内部股权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our information suggests that Webster Financial Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$82m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息显示,韦伯斯特金融公司内部持有不到1%的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,因此让内部持有公司的大部分股份是令人惊讶的。尽管他们持有的股份不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共同持有价值8200万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。可以说最近的买卖和持有同样重要。您可以点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Webster Financial. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
占有12%股份的一般公众,主要是个人投资者,对韦伯斯特金融有一定影响力。虽然这种所有权相当可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Webster Financial .
我发现查看一个公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们也需要考虑其他信息。为此,您应该注意韦伯斯特金融存在的一个警示信号。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。