T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:TROW) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 74% of the Company
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:TROW) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 74% of the Company
Key Insights
关键见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in T. Rowe Price Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 24 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 各机构在t. Rowe Price Group的大量持股意味着它们对该公司的股价具有重大影响
- 前 24 名股东拥有公司 51% 的股份
- 业内人士最近卖出了
To get a sense of who is truly in control of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:TROW), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 74% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解谁真正控制了t. Rowe Price Group, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:TROW),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。机构拥有74%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
鉴于其可支配的资金和研究能力巨大,机构所有权往往具有很大的份量,对于个人投资者而言尤其如此。因此,向公司投资的大量机构资金通常被视为积极属性。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of T. Rowe Price Group, beginning with the chart below.
让我们从下图开始,深入研究 t. Rowe Price Group 的每种所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About T. Rowe Price Group?
关于圣罗普莱斯集团,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
We can see that T. Rowe Price Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of T. Rowe Price Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,t. Rowe Price Group确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得一看的是t. Rowe Price Group过去的盈利轨迹(见下图)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. T. Rowe Price Group is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.7% by the third-largest shareholder.
由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。t. Rowe Price Group不归对冲基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份的12%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约8.8%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有6.7%的所有权。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 24 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现前24名股东拥有该公司的总所有权为51%,这表明没有一个单一股东对公司拥有重大控制权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。
Insider Ownership Of T. Rowe Price Group
圣罗普莱斯集团的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。
We can see that insiders own shares in T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.. Insiders own US$542m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们可以看到内部人士拥有t. Rowe Price Group, Inc.的股份。内部人士拥有价值5.42亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 24% stake in T. Rowe Price Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有t.Rowe Price集团24%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他更为重要的因素。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
许多人发现,深入了解一家公司过去的表现很有用。您可以访问这张过去的收益、收入和现金流的详细图表。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。