Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of Shandong Ruifeng Chemical Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300243) Gained 25%, Insiders Profited as Well
Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of Shandong Ruifeng Chemical Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300243) Gained 25%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Shandong Ruifeng Chemical by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 45% of the company
- Insider ownership in Shandong Ruifeng Chemical is 41%
- 个人投资者对瑞丰高材拥有重要控制权意味着普通大众对管理和治理决策有更大影响力
- 前25名股东拥有该公司的45%股份。
- 瑞丰高材的内部所有权占比为41%
If you want to know who really controls Shandong Ruifeng Chemical Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300243), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 54% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想了解谁真正控制着瑞丰高材股份有限公司(SZSE:300243),那么你需要看看其股东注册情况。个人投资者持有54%的股份,在公司中占据最大份额。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥3.1b last week, while insiders who own 41% also benefitted.
个人投资者在上周市值达到31亿人民币后获得了最大收益,而持有41%股份的内部人员也受益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shandong Ruifeng Chemical, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解瑞丰高材的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shandong Ruifeng Chemical?
机构持股究竟告诉我们有关瑞丰高材的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Less than 5% of Shandong Ruifeng Chemical is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.
少于5%的瑞丰高材股份由机构投资者持有。这表明一些基金正在关注这家公司,但许多人尚未购入其股票。如果公司从现在开始变得更强大,我们可能会看到更多机构有兴趣购买的情况。有时,当几家大型机构同时想购买某只股票时,我们会看到股价上涨。您可以在下面看到的收入和营业收入历史可能有助于考虑更多机构投资者是否希望购买该股。当然,还有很多其他因素需要考虑。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shandong Ruifeng Chemical. Shibin Zhou is currently the company's largest shareholder with 27% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.2% and 1.6% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Chunxin Liu directly holds 1.3% of the total shares outstanding.
对瑞丰高材,对冲基金持有的股份不多。目前,周世斌是该公司最大的股东,持有27%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约5.2%和1.6%的股份。此外,该公司CEO刘春新直接持有总流通股份的1.3%。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
尽管我们需要研究一个公司的机构所有权数据是有道理的,但也需要研究分析师的情绪来了解市场趋势。我们目前没有发现任何关于该股票的分析师报道,所以该公司可能不受广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Shandong Ruifeng Chemical
瑞丰高材内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Shandong Ruifeng Chemical Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.3b stake in this CN¥3.1b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息显示,内部人持有瑞丰高材的大量股份。内部人在这家31亿人民币的业务中持有13亿人民币的股份。我们认为这显示了与股东的一致,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然相当小;一些内部人可能是创立业务的。您可以单击此处查看这些内部人是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 54% of Shandong Ruifeng Chemical. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
普通公众,包括零售投资者,拥有瑞丰高材54%的股份。这种所有权大小使来自一般公众的投资者具有某种集体力量。他们可以并可能会影响对高管薪酬、股利政策和拟议的业务收购的决定。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Shandong Ruifeng Chemical is showing 6 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those make us uncomfortable...
在考虑拥有公司的不同群体时很值得一提,但还有更重要的因素。请注意,瑞丰高材在我们的投资分析中显示出6个警示信号,其中有2个让我们感到不安...
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
当然,您可能会在其他地方找到一项出色的投资。因此,请查看此免费的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。