Private Companies Are Xiamen Faratronic Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600563) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥3.5b Last Week
Private Companies Are Xiamen Faratronic Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600563) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥3.5b Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Xiamen Faratronic's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- Institutional ownership in Xiamen Faratronic is 28%
- 法拉電子重要的私人公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響
- 業務的52%由前4大股東持有。
- 法拉電子的機構所有權爲28%
If you want to know who really controls Xiamen Faratronic Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600563), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 43% to be precise, is private companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解誰真正控制法拉電子股份有限公司(SHSE:600563),那麼您需要查看其股東名冊的構成。 擁有該公司最多股份的集團,確切地說約佔43%,是私人公司。 換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。
As a result, private companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥30b market cap following a 13% gain in the stock.
作爲結果,私營公司上週共同獲得了最高評分,該公司股價上漲13%,市值達到了300億人民幣。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Xiamen Faratronic, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地了解廈門法拉電子各類型股東,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Xiamen Faratronic?
機構持股告訴我們關於廈門法拉電子的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Xiamen Faratronic. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Xiamen Faratronic's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在廈門法拉電子中持有相當數量的股份。這可以表明公司在投資社區擁有一定的信譽度。然而,在依靠機構投資者所謂的認可時最好保持警惕。他們有時也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在它們正在進行'擁擠交易'的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到廈門法拉電子的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更爲複雜的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Xiamen Faratronic. Xiamen Farah development Corp is currently the largest shareholder, with 37% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.6% and 5.3% of the stock.
對於法拉電子,對沖基金持有的股份不多。目前,廈門法拉發展有限公司是最大的股東,持有37%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.6%和5.3%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Xiamen Faratronic
廈門法拉電子的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Xiamen Faratronic Co., Ltd.. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CN¥160k worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們最新的數據顯示,法拉電子有限公司的內部持有人擁有不到1%的股份。不過值得注意的是,內部持有人可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構間接持有股份。這是一家大公司,因此即使持有比例很小,也能在董事會和股東之間建立對齊。在這種情況下,內部人士擁有價值16萬人民幣的股份。看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但值得檢查這些內部人士是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 29% stake in Xiamen Faratronic. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有法拉電子的29%股權。雖然這個所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 43%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有已發行股份的43%。這可能值得更深入地挖掘。如果相關方,如內部人員,對其中一個私人公司感興趣,那麼應在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對該公司具有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。