A Great Week for Institutional Investors Who Own 52% of Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE:WS)
A Great Week for Institutional Investors Who Own 52% of Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE:WS)
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Worthington Steel's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 4 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders own 31% of Worthington Steel
- 机构持有大量股份意味着沃辛顿钢铁的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感。
- 前4个股东拥有公司的51%股权。
- 内部人持有沃辛顿钢铁31%的股份。
Every investor in Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE:WS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
沃辛顿钢铁公司(NYSE:WS)的每位投资者都应该注意最强大的股东群体。拥有公司股份数量最多的群体,确切地说约占52%,是机构。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
As a result, institutional investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 15% gain.
作为结果,机构投资者是上周15%涨幅的最大受益者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Worthington Steel.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于Worthington Steel的什么信息。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241108/0-af67de756ee0e995c69871c5f9040854-0-3dd76c211414dbce2c0c6a33e8a96059.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Worthington Steel?
机构持股告诉我们关于Worthington Steel的什么信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
We can see that Worthington Steel does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Worthington Steel's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到Worthington Steel确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司的大部分股票。这可能意味着公司在投资社区有一定的信誉度。然而,最好对依靠机构投资者所带来的所谓验证保持警惕。他们有时也会犯错。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得查看Worthington Steel下面的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241108/0-af67de756ee0e995c69871c5f9040854-1-bd9066bc32508009f09426182cd9e29c.png/big)
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Worthington Steel is not owned by hedge funds. John McConnell is currently the company's largest shareholder with 29% of shares outstanding. With 9.7% and 8.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Geoffrey Gilmore is the owner of 0.5% of the company's shares.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以共同发挥重大的影响力。Worthington Steel不被对冲基金持有。约翰·麦康纳尔目前是公司最大的股东,持有29%的股份。此外,分别持有公司9.7%和8.0%的股份,BlackRock, Inc.和The Vanguard Group, Inc.是第二和第三大股东。此外,首席执行官杰弗里·吉尔摩拥有公司0.5%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前四名股东控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着该集团对公司的决策具有相当大的影响力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化学技术股份有限公司的内部人员拥有重要比例,内部人员在这家总价值27亿人民币的公司中持有12亿人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是否进行了买卖。
Insider Ownership Of Worthington Steel
Worthington Steel的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Worthington Steel, Inc.. Insiders own US$610m worth of shares in the US$2.0b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们最新的数据显示,内部人员拥有Worthington Steel, Inc.相当比例的股份。内部人员在这家价值20亿美元的公司中拥有61000万美元的股份。这是相当有意义的。看到这种投资水平是好事。您可以在这里查看,看看这些内部人员最近是否一直在购买。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众(包括零售投资者)拥有公司17%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然这种拥有量相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Worthington Steel better, we need to consider many other factors.
考虑到拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。 但要更好地了解Worthington Steel,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。