share_log

Positive Earnings Growth Hasn't Been Enough to Get Tong Ren Tang Technologies (HKG:1666) Shareholders a Favorable Return Over the Last Five Years

Positive Earnings Growth Hasn't Been Enough to Get Tong Ren Tang Technologies (HKG:1666) Shareholders a Favorable Return Over the Last Five Years

積極的盈利增長在過去五年來並不足以讓同仁堂科技(HKG:1666)的股東獲得有利的回報
Simply Wall St ·  11/07 18:17

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But even the best stock picker will only win with some selections. So we wouldn't blame long term Tong Ren Tang Technologies Co. Ltd. (HKG:1666) shareholders for doubting their decision to hold, with the stock down 25% over a half decade. But it's up 8.8% in the last week.

爲了證明選擇個股的努力是值得的,值得努力超越市場指數基金的回報。但即使是最好的股票選手也只能在某些選擇上獲勝。因此,我們不會責怪長揸同仁堂科技股份有限公司(HKG:1666)的股東對他們的決定持懷疑態度,因爲股價在過去半個十年下跌了25%。但在上週上漲了8.8%。

On a more encouraging note the company has added HK$576m to its market cap in just the last 7 days, so let's see if we can determine what's driven the five-year loss for shareholders.

更令人鼓舞的是,公司在過去7天內將5億7600萬港元增加到了其市值,讓我們看看是否可以確定是什麼導致了股東五年來的虧損。

To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

爲了概述本傑明·格雷厄姆(Benjamin Graham)的話:短期內,市場是一臺投票機,但長期來看,它是一臺衡重機。思考一家公司的市場感知如何轉變的一種不完美但簡單的方法是將每股收益(EPS)變化與股價變動進行比較。

During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, Tong Ren Tang Technologies actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 0.7% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or possibly, the market was previously very optimistic, so the stock has disappointed, despite improving EPS.

在不幸的半個十年裏,股價下跌的同時,同仁堂科技實際上看到每股收益(EPS)每年提高了0.7%。考慮到股價的反應,人們可能會懷疑EPS在這段時間內並不是業務表現的良好指標(可能是由於一次性損失或收益)。或者,市場之前非常樂觀,所以股票儘管EPS有所改善,仍然令人失望。

By glancing at these numbers, we'd posit that the the market had expectations of much higher growth, five years ago. Having said that, we might get a better idea of what's going on with the stock by looking at other metrics.

通過瞥一眼這些數字,我們認爲,五年前市場對較高增長有很高的期望。話雖如此,通過觀察其他指標,我們可能會更好地了解股票的情況。

In contrast to the share price, revenue has actually increased by 11% a year in the five year period. So it seems one might have to take closer look at the fundamentals to understand why the share price languishes. After all, there may be an opportunity.

與股價相比,營業收入在過去五年每年實際上增長了11%。因此,看起來需要更仔細地了解基本面,才能理解爲什麼股價表現不佳。畢竟,可能存在機會。

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下面的圖表顯示了收益和營收隨時間的變化情況(通過單擊圖像揭示確切的值)。

big
SEHK:1666 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 7th 2024
SEHK:1666於2024年11月7日的收益和營業收入增長

It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think Tong Ren Tang Technologies will earn in the future (free profit forecasts).

值得注意的是CEO的薪酬低於類似規模公司的中位數。然而,CEO的薪酬總是值得檢查的,真正重要的問題是公司未來是否能增長收益。因此,查看分析師認爲同仁堂科技未來將賺取多少利潤(免費利潤預測)是很有意義的。

What About Dividends?

關於分紅派息的問題

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. As it happens, Tong Ren Tang Technologies' TSR for the last 5 years was -13%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

考慮任何給定股票的總股東回報以及股價回報是很重要的。TSR包括任何分拆或折價增資的價值,以及基於股息被再投資的假設,任何分紅。因此,對於支付豐厚股息的公司,TSR通常比股價回報高得多。同樣,同仁堂科技過去5年的TSR爲-13%,超過了前面提到的股價回報。毫無意外地,分紅支付在很大程度上解釋了這種偏差!

A Different Perspective

另一種看法

While the broader market gained around 22% in the last year, Tong Ren Tang Technologies shareholders lost 5.7% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 2% over the last half decade. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Tong Ren Tang Technologies (of which 2 are a bit unpleasant!) you should know about.

儘管整體市場在過去一年中上漲了大約22%,同仁堂科技的股東們卻虧損了5.7%(即使包括分紅)。即使好股票的股價有時會下跌,但在我們對業務的基本指標看到改善之前,我們不會對其產生太多興趣。不幸的是,去年的表現可能表明存在未解決的挑戰,因爲比過去半個世紀年化虧損2%的表現還要糟糕。我們知道羅斯柴爾德勳爵曾說過,投資者應該在「街上有血的時候買入」,但我們警告說,投資者應該首先確保自己在購買一家高質量的企業。考慮市場條件對股價的不同影響是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。比如風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現了同仁堂科技的3個警示信號(其中有2個有點不太令人愉快!)你應該知道。

We will like Tong Ren Tang Technologies better if we see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of undervalued stocks (mostly small caps) with considerable, recent, insider buying.

如果我們看到一些大規模內部人員買入,我們將更喜歡同仁堂科技。在等待的時候,請查看這份免費的被低估股票名單(主要是小盤股),其中包括相當多的最近內部人員買入。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Hong Kong exchanges.

請注意,本文引述的市場回報率反映了目前在香港交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報率。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論