The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (NYSE:SAM) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 8.6% Loss Over the Past Year
The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (NYSE:SAM) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 8.6% Loss Over the Past Year
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Boston Beer Company implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
- Insiders own 24% of Boston Beer Company
- 機構在波士頓啤酒公司的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價具有重大影響
- 前6名股東持有公司51%的股份。
- 內部人擁有波士頓啤酒公司24%的股權
To get a sense of who is truly in control of The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (NYSE:SAM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 63% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
爲了了解誰真正控制着紐交所波士頓啤酒公司(NYSE:SAM),了解企業的所有權結構至關重要。我們可以看到,機構持有公司63%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 5.5% increase in the share price after a year of 8.6% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.
機構投資者可能會歡迎上週股價上漲5.5%,在連續8.6%的下跌之後,這可能是回報率開始上升的跡象。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Boston Beer Company.
在下面的圖表中,我們會詳細研究波士頓啤酒公司的不同股權所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Boston Beer Company?
機構所有權告訴我們關於波士頓啤酒公司的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Boston Beer Company already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Boston Beer Company, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
波士頓啤酒公司的股東名冊中已經有機構。事實上,他們在公司擁有一定比例的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩位大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某支股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查一下波斯頓啤酒公司的過去盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Boston Beer Company. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Boston Beer Company's case, its Top Key Executive, C. Koch, is the largest shareholder, holding 20% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.9% and 7.2% of the stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過半數已發行股票,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。對於波士頓啤酒公司,對沖基金持有的股份不多。因爲行動勝過言辭,如果內部股東持有公司的重要股份,我們認爲這是一個好跡象。在波士頓啤酒公司的案例中,其最高主要執行官C. 科赫是最大的股東,持有流通股的20%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約7.9%和7.2%的股票。
We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前6大股東持有超過一半的股份登記簿,有一些較小的股東來平衡較大股東的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Boston Beer Company
波士頓啤酒公司的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of The Boston Beer Company, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$826m stake in this US$3.4b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
波士頓啤酒似乎內部持有相當比例的股份。看到內部人士在這家34億美元的企業中持有有意義的82600萬美元股份確實非常有趣。多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望獲取最近內部人員交易的免費圖表。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Boston Beer Company. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在波斯頓啤酒公司持有13%的股份。雖然這一群體不能必然左右決策,但肯定可以對公司的運營產生實質影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Boston Beer Company better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Boston Beer Company you should know about.
考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解波斯頓啤酒公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。考慮到風險,例如。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現波斯頓啤酒公司的1個警示標誌,您應該知道。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。