Rastar Group (SZSE:300043) Surges 15%; Retail Investors Who Own 52% Shares Profited Along With Insiders
Rastar Group (SZSE:300043) Surges 15%; Retail Investors Who Own 52% Shares Profited Along With Insiders
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Rastar Group by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 48% of the company
- 35% of Rastar Group is held by insiders
- 零售投资者对星辉娱乐的重大控制意味着普通公众对管理和治理相关决策有更大的影响力
- 该公司前 25 名股东拥有该公司的 48%。
- 星辉娱乐的35%股份由内部股东持有
A look at the shareholders of Rastar Group (SZSE:300043) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is retail investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看星辉娱乐(SZSE:300043)的股东可以告诉我们哪一组最具影响力。持有公司最多股份的一组,准确地说是约52%,是零售投资者。换句话说,该组在投资公司方面可以获得最多(或失去最多)收益。
Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥4.3b last week, while insiders who own 35% also benefitted.
零售投资者在上周市值达到43亿元人民币后获利最多,而持有35%股份的内部人员也受益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Rastar Group, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解星辉娱乐每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rastar Group?
机构持股告诉我们关于星辉娱乐的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Rastar Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Rastar Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
星辉娱乐已经有机构在股东名册上。事实上,他们在公司拥有相当可观的股份。这表明公司在投资社区中享有一定的信誉度。然而,最好谨慎依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会搞错。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总会存在它们在'拥挤的交易'中的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以查看星辉娱乐的历史收入和收益,但请记住故事总是更多。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Rastar Group. Yan Sheng Chen is currently the company's largest shareholder with 33% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.5% and 2.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我们注意到,对于星辉娱乐,对冲基金没有显著的投资。陈彦生目前是公司最大的股东,持有33%的股份。与此同时,第二、第三大股东分别持有2.5%和2.0%的流通股。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但还是研究分析师的建议,以深入了解股票预期表现,是一个好习惯。就我们所知,该公司没有分析师覆盖,因此可能没有引起注意。
Insider Ownership Of Rastar Group
星辉娱乐的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Rastar Group. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥4.3b, and insiders have CN¥1.5b worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我们的信息显示,内部人士在星辉娱乐持有大量股份。其市值仅为43亿元人民币,内部人士名下拥有价值15亿元人民币的股票。这可能表明创始人仍持有大量股份。您可以 点击这里 查看他们是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 52% stake in Rastar Group, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
普通大众,通常是个人投资者,在星辉娱乐持有相当大的52%股份,这表明它是一只相当受欢迎的股票。凭借这种所有权,零售投资者可以共同在影响股东回报的决策中发挥作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他们还可以行使投票权对可能并无益于盈利的收购或合并进行表决。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Rastar Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Rastar Group (at least 2 which can't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
始终值得考虑公司的股东群体。但要更好地了解星辉娱乐,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,投资风险的永远存在。我们已经发现了星辉娱乐的3个警示信号(至少有2个不容忽视),了解它们应该成为你的投资过程的一部分。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
当然,这可能不是最好的购买股票。因此,查看这份免费免费的有趣公司列表可能会有所帮助。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。