Institutional Investors Are Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s (NYSE:TPB) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$63m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s (NYSE:TPB) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$63m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Turning Point Brands' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 机构拥有的股份比例极高,这意味着 turning point brands 的股价对它们的交易行为非常敏感
- 前11名股东持有公司50%的股份。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
A look at the shareholders of Turning Point Brands, Inc. (NYSE:TPB) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 81% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下 turning point brands 公司(纽交所:TPB)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最有影响力。我们可以看到,机构持有公司81%的股权。换句话说,这个群体有可能从投资公司中获得最多利益(或者蒙受最大损失)。
Last week's 7.4% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 144% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上周的7.4%增长意味着机构投资者处在积极的一端,即使公司展现出强劲的长期趋势。 股东的一年回报率目前为144%,上周的增长更是锦上添花。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Turning Point Brands, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究Turning Point Brands的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241109/0-9407f1e1d3a25173137d4db95d2efa4d-0-3a0a3f01852662478dfa254b20ddc0b7.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Turning Point Brands?
机构持股告诉我们关于Turning Point Brands的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Turning Point Brands does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Turning Point Brands, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到Turning Point Brands确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有该公司的大部分股票。 这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉。 但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为有时机构也会犯错误的投资,就像每个人一样。 如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售某只股票,可能会看到股价大幅下跌。 因此,值得检查Turning Point Brands的过去收益轨迹(以下)。 当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241109/0-9407f1e1d3a25173137d4db95d2efa4d-1-77b70d1bc34770fcea2232084f07b5ef.png/big)
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Turning Point Brands is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.8% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.6% and 6.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Graham Purdy directly holds 0.9% of the total shares outstanding.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能会需要关注他们的偏好。Turning Point Brands不是由对冲基金所持有。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是该公司最大的股东,持有8.8%的已发行股份。与此同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的8.6%和6.9%。此外,公司的CEO Graham Purdy直接持有总已发行股份的0.9%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股东登记册,我们发现其中 50% 的所有权受前11位股东控制,这意味着没有单一股东掌握所有权益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究机构持股比例是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。同样可以通过研究分析师情绪来实现。由于相当多的分析师都关注着该股票,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of Turning Point Brands
Turning Point Brands的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Turning Point Brands, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$879m, and insiders have US$39m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们最新的数据显示,内部人员在Turning Point Brands, Inc.持有部分股份。其市值仅为87900万美元,内部人员名下的股票价值3900万美元。有些人可能会说这显示了股东与董事会之间利益的一致性。但值得检查的是,这些内部人员是否一直在卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Turning Point Brands. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
持有12%的个人投资者组成的普通大众对Turning Point Brands具有一定的影响力。虽然这个群体不能说了算,但肯定会对公司的运行产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Turning Point Brands , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。考虑到投资风险这一永恒的威胁。我们已经发现了与turning point brands相关的两个警示信号,了解它们应该成为您投资过程的一部分。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。