YONFER Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:000902) Top Owners Are Private Companies With 48% Stake, While 33% Is Held by Individual Investors
YONFER Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:000902) Top Owners Are Private Companies With 48% Stake, While 33% Is Held by Individual Investors
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in YONFER Agricultural Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 2 shareholders own 53% of the company
- Institutions own 12% of YONFER Agricultural Technology
- YONFER農業科技由私營企業擁有大量股權,表明他們共同在管理和業務策略上有更大的發言權
- 前兩大股東擁有該公司的53%股權。
- 機構擁有YONFER農業科技12%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of YONFER Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000902), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 48% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着YONFER農業科技股份有限公司(SZSE:000902),重要的是要了解企業的所有權結構。私營企業持有48%的股份,是公司中持股最多的機構。這意味着,如果股價上漲(或出現下行),該集團將獲益最大(或損失最大)。
Meanwhile, individual investors make up 33% of the company's shareholders.
同時,個人投資者佔公司股東的33%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about YONFER Agricultural Technology.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關YONFER農業科技的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About YONFER Agricultural Technology?
機構持股告訴我們關於YONFER農業科技的信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in YONFER Agricultural Technology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of YONFER Agricultural Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在YONFER農業科技中持有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者之間存在一定的可信度。但單靠這一事實是不能夠依賴的,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤的投資決定,就像每個人都會一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時賣出某支股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得在檢查YONFER農業科技的過往收益軌跡時(如下),要記住也有其他因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in YONFER Agricultural Technology. Yangfeng Stock Co.,ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 48% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 4.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.7% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Hua Feng Yang, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.
對沖基金在永豐農業科技公司持股不多。永豐股份有限公司目前是該公司最大的股東,持有48%的股份。舉例來說,第二大股東持有約4.6%的股份,緊隨其後的第三大股東持有2.7%的股份。此外,我們發現CEO華風洋擁有0.7% 的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前兩個股東共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,說明他們有相當大的影響力來影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of YONFER Agricultural Technology
永豐農業科技公司內部人士持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in YONFER Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own CN¥1.1b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
股東可能會對知道內部人員在永泓農業科技股份有限公司擁有股份感興趣。這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性是件好事。內部人員擁有價值11億人民幣的股份(按目前價格計算)。看到內部人員進行這種程度的投資是件好事。您可以在這裏檢查看看這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 33% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over YONFER Agricultural Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
持股33%,主要是由個人投資者組成的普通大衆在永泓農業科技公司擁有一定的影響力。儘管擁有如此規模的股權相當可觀,但若決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 48%, of the YONFER Agricultural Technology stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
YONFER農產品科技股份48%由私人公司持有。 進一步研究可能是值得的。如果關聯方(如內部人員)對其中一傢俬人公司有興趣,那應該在年度報告中披露。 私人公司也可能對公司有戰略興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - YONFER Agricultural Technology has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。 舉例來說,冒險 - YONFER農產品科技有1個警告標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。