Cinderson Tech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603344) Most Bullish Insider, Senior Key Executive Yunfang Zhu Must Be Pleased With the Recent 9.5% Gain
Cinderson Tech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603344) Most Bullish Insider, Senior Key Executive Yunfang Zhu Must Be Pleased With the Recent 9.5% Gain
Key Insights
主要见解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Cinderson Tech (Suzhou)'s growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- The largest shareholder of the company is Yunfang Zhu with a 70% stake
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 内部人士似乎对新顿科技(苏州)的增长有既得利益,因为他们拥有相当大的股份
- 该公司的最大股东是朱云芳,持有70%的股份
- 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。
Every investor in Cinderson Tech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603344) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 70% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位新顿科技(苏州)有限公司(上交所代码:603344)的投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。通过70%的股份,个人内部人士在公司中拥有最多的股份。换句话说,该群体在股票上涨时将获得最大利益(或在出现 downturn 时损失最多)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥4.5b market cap following a 9.5% gain in the stock.
因此,内部人士上周得分最高,因为公司在股票上涨9.5%后,市值达到了45亿人民币。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Cinderson Tech (Suzhou).
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于Cinderson Tech(苏州)的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cinderson Tech (Suzhou)?
机构持股情况能告诉我们关于Cinderson Tech(苏州)的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Less than 5% of Cinderson Tech (Suzhou) is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.
少于5%的Cinderson Tech(苏州)股份由机构投资者持有。这表明一些基金正在关注这家公司,但许多基金尚未买入股票。如果公司营收增长,这可能表明它刚开始吸引这些资金充裕的投资者的注意。当多个机构投资者想要买入股票时,我们通常会看到股价上涨。过去的营业收入轨迹(如下图所示)可能是未来增长的一个指标,但并没有保证。
Cinderson Tech (Suzhou) is not owned by hedge funds. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Yunfang Zhu (who also holds the title of Senior Key Executive) with 70% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. With 2.8% and 2.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, Shenzhen Dachen Caizhi Venture Capital Management Co., Ltd. and Ningbo Qijing Business Consulting Partnership (Limited Partnership) are the second and third largest shareholders.
Cinderson Tech(苏州)并不被对冲基金所持有。根据我们的数据,我们推测最大股东是Yunfang Zhu(他还担任高级关键执行官),持有70%的流通股份。内部人持有公司大量股份通常被视为一个好迹象,在这种情况下,我们很高兴看到公司内部人充当关键利益相关者。 深圳市达辰财智创投管理有限公司和宁波启景商务咨询合伙企业(有限合伙)分别持有2.8%和2.6%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股东。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化学技术股份有限公司的内部人员拥有重要比例,内部人员在这家总价值27亿人民币的公司中持有12亿人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是否进行了买卖。
Insider Ownership Of Cinderson Tech (Suzhou)
Cinderson Tech(苏州)的内部人持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Cinderson Tech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a CN¥3.1b stake in this CN¥4.5b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的信息显示,内部联系人持有苏州文森科技有限公司超过一半的股份。这使得他们对公司的有效控制。 所以他们在这个市值为45亿人民币的业务中,持有31亿人民币的股份。看到这种投资水平很好。您可以在这里查看这些内部联系人是否最近有买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cinderson Tech (Suzhou). While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众持有24%的股份,主要是由个人投资者组成,因此对苏州文森科技有一定的影响力。虽然这种持股规模可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Cinderson Tech (Suzhou) you should be aware of, and 1 of them is concerning.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体非常重要,但还有其他因素更为关键。 举例来说:我们注意到了苏州文森科技的2个警告信号,您需要注意其中1个是令人担忧的。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。