Institutional Investors Are Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s (NYSE:KMI) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$6.0b Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s (NYSE:KMI) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$6.0b Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Kinder Morgan implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 50% of the business is held by the top 20 shareholders
- Recent sales by insiders
- 機構對金德爾摩根的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響
- 前20名股東持有該公司業務的50%。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
If you want to know who really controls Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE:KMI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 67% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着金德爾摩根公司(紐交所:KMI),那麼你需要查看其股東登記簿的構成。持有公司最大數量股份的組織,準確說爲約67%,就是機構。換句話說,該組織面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 11% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 73% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
作爲結果,機構投資者在上週公司股價上漲11%後獲得了最豐厚的回報。股東們的一年回報率目前爲73%,而上週的漲幅更是錦上添花。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Kinder Morgan.
讓我們仔細研究一下,了解不同類型的股東對金德爾摩根能告訴我們些什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kinder Morgan?
機構持股給我們關於Kinder Morgan的什麼信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Kinder Morgan. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Kinder Morgan's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在金德爾摩根持有相當大比例的股權。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變他們對某隻股票的看法,股價可能會快速下跌。因此,值得看一下以下金德爾摩根的收入歷史數據。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Kinder Morgan. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Richard Kinder (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 12% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.1% by the third-largest shareholder.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們集體具有重大影響力。我們注意到,對金德爾摩根沒有投資的對沖基金。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是理查德·金德(也擔任首席關鍵高管)持有公司12% 的股份。當內部人員在公司擁有大量股份時,通常被認爲是一個好跡象,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到一名公司內部人扮演關鍵利益相關者的角色。以此爲背景,第二大股東持有公司約9.1%的流通股份,第三大股東持有7.1%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 20 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們所有權數據的進一步觀察表明,前20大股東持有50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Kinder Morgan
Kinder Morgan的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Kinder Morgan, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$7.5b stake in this US$60b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來內部持股人擁有金德爾摩根股份的相當大比例。看到內部人在這家市值600億美元的公司中持有價值75億美元的股份確實很有趣。看到這種投資水平是很好的。您可以在這裏查看內部人最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Kinder Morgan. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,在金德爾摩根持有20%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Kinder Morgan (including 2 which are significant) .
我發現了解一家公司的所有者是非常有趣的。但要真正獲得深入了解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該了解我們在金德爾摩根發現的3個警示信號(其中2個非常重要)。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。