Red Rock Resorts (NASDAQ:RRR) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet
Red Rock Resorts (NASDAQ:RRR) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (NASDAQ:RRR) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
由伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李露對此毫不掩飾,他說:「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久的資本損失。」當我們思考一家公司的風險有多大時,我們總是喜歡考慮其債務的用途,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。與許多其他公司一樣,紅巖度假村公司(納斯達克股票代碼:RRR)也使用債務。但是,股東是否應該擔心其債務的使用?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來什麼風險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
債務可以幫助企業,直到企業難以償還債務,無論是新資本還是自由現金流。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法向債權人付款,它可能會破產。但是,更常見(但仍然令人痛苦)的情況是,它必須以低廉的價格籌集新的股本,從而永久稀釋股東。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們考慮公司使用債務時,我們首先將現金和債務放在一起考慮。
How Much Debt Does Red Rock Resorts Carry?
紅巖度假村揹負了多少債務?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of June 2024 Red Rock Resorts had US$3.45b of debt, an increase on US$3.31b, over one year. However, it also had US$137.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$3.31b.
你可以點擊下圖查看歷史數字,但它顯示,截至2024年6月,紅巖度假村在一年內有34.5億美元的債務,比33.1億美元有所增加。但是,它也有1.37億美元的現金,因此其淨負債爲33.1億美元。
A Look At Red Rock Resorts' Liabilities
看看紅巖度假村的負債
According to the last reported balance sheet, Red Rock Resorts had liabilities of US$305.3m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$3.48b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$137.0m in cash and US$73.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$3.58b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
根據上次報告的資產負債表,紅巖度假村在12個月內到期的負債爲3.053億美元,12個月以後到期的負債爲34.8億美元。與此相抵消的是,它有1.37億美元的現金和7,300萬美元的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出35.8億美元。
This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of US$5.60b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Red Rock Resorts' use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.
相對於其56.0億美元的市值,這一赤字相當可觀,因此這確實表明股東應密切關注紅巖度假村的債務使用情況。這表明,如果公司需要迅速支撐資產負債表,股東將被嚴重稀釋。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們通過以下方法來衡量公司的債務負擔與其盈利能力:將其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),並計算其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)支付利息支出(利息保障)的難易程度。這種方法的優勢在於,我們既考慮了債務的絕對數量(包括淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤),也考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(及其利息覆蓋率)。
Red Rock Resorts's debt is 4.3 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 2.7 times over. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Given the debt load, it's hardly ideal that Red Rock Resorts's EBIT was pretty flat over the last twelve months. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Red Rock Resorts's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
紅巖度假村的債務是其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的4.3倍,其息稅前利潤支付利息支出的2.7倍。這表明,儘管債務水平很高,但我們不會稱其爲有問題。考慮到債務負擔,紅巖度假村的息稅前利潤在過去十二個月中保持相當平穩並不理想。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但是,未來的收益比什麼都重要,將決定紅巖度假村未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Red Rock Resorts reported free cash flow worth 8.4% of its EBIT, which is really quite low. For us, cash conversion that low sparks a little paranoia about is ability to extinguish debt.
最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤根本無法減少債務。因此,我們總是檢查該息稅前利潤中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在過去的三年中,紅巖度假村報告的自由現金流佔其息稅前利潤的8.4%,確實很低。對我們來說,低現金轉換率會引發一點偏執狂,那就是償還債務的能力。
Our View
我們的觀點
On the face of it, Red Rock Resorts's net debt to EBITDA left us tentative about the stock, and its interest cover was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. Having said that, its ability to grow its EBIT isn't such a worry. Looking at the bigger picture, it seems clear to us that Red Rock Resorts's use of debt is creating risks for the company. If all goes well, that should boost returns, but on the flip side, the risk of permanent capital loss is elevated by the debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 3 warning signs with Red Rock Resorts (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
從表面上看,紅巖度假村對息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的淨負債使我們對該股持初步看法,其利息保障並不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚那家空蕩蕩的餐廳更具吸引力。話雖如此,其增長息稅前利潤的能力並不令人擔憂。從大局來看,我們似乎很清楚紅巖度假村對債務的使用正在給公司帶來風險。如果一切順利,這應該會提高回報,但另一方面,債務會增加永久資本損失的風險。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。我們已經在Red Rock Resorts發現了3個警告信號(至少有1個有點不愉快),了解它們應該是你投資過程的一部分。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
當然,如果你是那種喜歡在沒有債務負擔的情況下購買股票的投資者,那麼請立即查看我們的獨家淨現金增長股票清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。