Houlihan Lokey, Inc.'s (NYSE:HLI) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 11% Over Last Week
Houlihan Lokey, Inc.'s (NYSE:HLI) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 11% Over Last Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Houlihan Lokey's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 20 shareholders
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 高機構所有權意味着Houlihan Lokey的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
- 51% 的業務由前 20 名股東持有
- 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會
A look at the shareholders of Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (NYSE:HLI) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 77% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看看Houlihan Lokey, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:HLI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲77%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
Last week's 11% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The one-year return on investment is currently 88% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上週11%的漲幅意味着,儘管該公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一端。目前,一年的投資回報率爲88%,上週的收益本來會非常受歡迎。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Houlihan Lokey.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Houlihan Lokey的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Houlihan Lokey?
關於Houlihan Lokey,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
We can see that Houlihan Lokey does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Houlihan Lokey, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,Houlihan Lokey確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Houlihan Lokey過去的收益軌跡(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Houlihan Lokey is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.4% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.2% of common stock, and EARNEST Partners, LLC holds about 4.7% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Scott Adelson is the owner of 1.3% of the company's shares.
由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。Houlihan Lokey 不歸對沖基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股東,已發行股份的7.4%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有7.2%的普通股,Earnest Partners, LLC持有該公司約4.7%的股份。此外,首席執行官斯科特·阿德爾森持有該公司1.3%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 20 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記處,我們可以看到,51%的所有權由前20名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東在所有權中擁有多數權益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Houlihan Lokey
Houlihan Lokey 的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Houlihan Lokey, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$746m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.
我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Houlihan Lokey, Inc.的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員共擁有價值7.46億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。我們有時會對他們是買入還是賣出感興趣。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Houlihan Lokey. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Houlihan Lokey17%的股份。儘管這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的交互式圖表。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。