Arcosa (NYSE:ACA) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
Arcosa (NYSE:ACA) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Arcosa, Inc. (NYSE:ACA) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
伯克希尔·哈撒韦的查理·芒格支持的外部基金经理李录在谈到投资风险时毫不掩饰地表示:“最大的投资风险不是价格波动,而是是否会遭受永久性资本损失。” 当我们考虑一家公司有多大风险时,我们总是喜欢看它的债务使用情况,因为债务过载可能导致灭顶之灾。 我们注意到Arcosa公司(纽交所:ACA)的资产负债表上确实有债务。 但真正的问题是这笔债务是否让公司变得风险更高。
When Is Debt Dangerous?
债务何时有危险?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
当企业无法通过自由现金流或以优惠的价格筹集资金来轻松履行债务或债务时,债务和其他负债就会对企业产生风险。如果情况变得非常糟糕,贷方可以接管企业。然而,更频繁(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,企业必须以低于市场价的价格发行股票,永久稀释股东,以加强其资产负债表。当然,债务可以是企业重要的工具,特别是在资本密集的企业中。当我们检查债务水平时,首先考虑现金和债务水平。
What Is Arcosa's Debt?
Arcosa的债务是什么?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 Arcosa had US$1.23b of debt, an increase on US$495.4m, over one year. However, it also had US$756.8m in cash, and so its net debt is US$471.4m.
您可以点击下面的图表查看历史数据,但数据显示,截至2024年9月,Arcosa的债务为12.3亿美元,较去年增加了49540万美元。然而,它也有75680万美元的现金,因此净债务为47140万美元。
How Strong Is Arcosa's Balance Sheet?
Arcosa的资产负债表有多强?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Arcosa had liabilities of US$432.3m due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.49b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$756.8m as well as receivables valued at US$396.4m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$769.6m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
最新的资产负债表数据显示,Arcosa短期债务为43230万美元,长期债务为14.9亿美元。 抵消这些债务的是,它手头现金为75680万美元,以及价值39640万美元的应收账款在12个月内到期。 因此,其负债总额比现金和短期应收账款的总和多了76960万美元。
Since publicly traded Arcosa shares are worth a total of US$5.16b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.
由于上市的Arcosa股票总值为51.6亿美元,这种水平的负债似乎不太可能构成重大威胁。 但是有足够的负债,我们肯定建议股东继续关注资产负债表的情况。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
为了衡量公司债务相对于其收入的规模,我们计算其净债务除以利息、税收、折旧和摊销前利润(EBITDA),并计算其利息前税利润(EBIT)除以利息支出(其利息覆盖率)。这样,我们考虑了债务的绝对金额,以及支付的利率。
Looking at its net debt to EBITDA of 1.2 and interest cover of 5.9 times, it seems to us that Arcosa is probably using debt in a pretty reasonable way. But the interest payments are certainly sufficient to have us thinking about how affordable its debt is. It is well worth noting that Arcosa's EBIT shot up like bamboo after rain, gaining 34% in the last twelve months. That'll make it easier to manage its debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Arcosa's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
观察其净债务与EBITDA为1.2倍,利息保障倍数为5.9倍,我们认为Arcosa可能在相当合理的范围内使用债务。 但是利息支付肯定足以让我们思考其负债的可承受能力。 值得一提的是,Arcosa的EBIT在过去12个月中迅速增长了34%。 这将使其更容易管理债务。 当分析债务时,资产负债表显然是需要重点关注的领域。 但是最终决定Arcosa未来是否能保持健康资产负债表的,更多取决于未来的盈利。 如果您想了解专业人士的看法,可以查看关于分析师利润预测的免费报告。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, Arcosa produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 54% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.
最后,一个企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润并不能解决问题。 因此,我们总是检查多少EBIT被转化为自由现金流。 在过去的三年中,Arcosa产生了可靠的自由现金流,相当于其EBIT的54%,符合我们的预期。 这笔冷硬现金意味着在需要时它可以减少债务。
Our View
我们的观点
Arcosa's EBIT growth rate suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. And we also thought its net debt to EBITDA was a positive. When we consider the range of factors above, it looks like Arcosa is pretty sensible with its use of debt. That means they are taking on a bit more risk, in the hope of boosting shareholder returns. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - Arcosa has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
Arcosa的EBIt增长率表明它可以像Cristiano Ronaldo在对阵14岁以下守门员时进球一样轻松地处理债务。我们还认为其净债务与EBITDA之比是很正面的。考虑到以上因素的范围时,Arcosa在债务使用上似乎非常明智。这意味着他们在希望提高股东回报的同时承担了更多风险。当您分析债务时,资产负债表显然是需要重点关注的领域。然而,并不是所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表内 - 远非如此。例如 - Arcosa有1个警示标志,我们认为您应该注意。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
每天结束时,通常更好地关注那些没有净债务的公司。您可以查看我们特别名单上的这些公司(所有这些公司都有盈利增长记录)。这是免费的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。