share_log

Some May Be Optimistic About Parsons' (NYSE:PSN) Earnings

Some May Be Optimistic About Parsons' (NYSE:PSN) Earnings

一些人可能對帕森斯(紐交所:PSN)的盈利持樂觀態度
Simply Wall St ·  11/13 02:29

Parsons Corporation's (NYSE:PSN) stock was strong despite it releasing a soft earnings report last week. We think that investors might be looking at some positive factors beyond the earnings numbers.

儘管帕森斯公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:PSN)上週發佈了疲軟的收益報告,但其股票表現強勁。我們認爲,除了收益數字外,投資者可能會考慮一些積極因素。

big
NYSE:PSN Earnings and Revenue History November 12th 2024
紐約證券交易所:PSN 收益和收入歷史記錄 2024 年 11 月 12 日

A Closer Look At Parsons' Earnings

仔細看看帕森斯的收入

As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

正如金融迷已經知道的那樣,現金流的應計比率是評估公司自由現金流(FCF)與利潤匹配程度的關鍵指標。爲了獲得應計比率,我們首先從一段時期的利潤中減去FCF,然後將該數字除以該期間的平均運營資產。該比率向我們顯示了公司的利潤超過其FCF的程度。

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth.

這意味着負應計比率是一件好事,因爲它表明該公司帶來的自由現金流比其利潤所暗示的要多。雖然正應計比率表明非現金利潤達到一定水平不是問題,但高應計比率可以說是一件壞事,因爲它表明紙面利潤與現金流不匹配。這是因爲一些學術研究表明,高應計率往往會導致利潤下降或利潤增長減弱。

For the year to September 2024, Parsons had an accrual ratio of -0.16. Therefore, its statutory earnings were very significantly less than its free cashflow. In fact, it had free cash flow of US$547m in the last year, which was a lot more than its statutory profit of US$78.7m. Parsons' free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see. However, that's not all there is to consider. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.

在截至2024年9月的一年中,帕森斯的應計比率爲-0.16。因此,其法定收入大大低於其自由現金流。實際上,它去年的自由現金流爲5.47億美元,遠遠超過其7,870萬美元的法定利潤。帕森斯的自由現金流比去年有所改善,總體而言,這是件好事。但是,這還不是要考慮的全部。我們可以看到,不尋常的項目影響了其法定利潤,從而影響了應計比率。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以點擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。

How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?

不尋常的物品如何影響利潤?

Parsons' profit was reduced by unusual items worth US$215m in the last twelve months, and this helped it produce high cash conversion, as reflected by its unusual items. In a scenario where those unusual items included non-cash charges, we'd expect to see a strong accrual ratio, which is exactly what has happened in this case. While deductions due to unusual items are disappointing in the first instance, there is a silver lining. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. Parsons took a rather significant hit from unusual items in the year to September 2024. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items made its statutory profit significantly weaker than it would otherwise be.

在過去的十二個月中,價值2.15億美元的不尋常物品減少了Parsons的利潤,這幫助其產生了很高的現金轉化率,其不尋常的物品就反映了這一點。在這些不尋常的項目包括非現金費用的情況下,我們預計會看到強勁的應計比率,而這正是本案中發生的情況。儘管由於不尋常項目而產生的扣除首先令人失望,但有一線希望。當我們分析全球絕大多數上市公司時,我們發現重大不尋常的事項往往不會重演。而且,畢竟,這正是會計術語的含義。在截至2024年9月的一年中,帕森斯因不尋常的物品而遭受了相當大的打擊。因此,我們可以推測,這些不尋常的物品使其法定利潤明顯低於原來的水平。

Our Take On Parsons' Profit Performance

我們對帕森斯利潤表現的看法

In conclusion, both Parsons' accrual ratio and its unusual items suggest that its statutory earnings are probably reasonably conservative. After considering all this, we reckon Parsons' statutory profit probably understates its earnings potential! In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs that you should run your eye over to get a better picture of Parsons.

總之,帕森斯的應計比率及其不尋常的項目都表明其法定收益可能相當保守。在考慮了所有這些之後,我們認爲帕森斯的法定利潤可能低估了其盈利潛力!有鑑於此,如果你想對公司進行更多分析,了解所涉及的風險至關重要。例如,我們發現了兩個警告信號,爲了更好地了解帕森斯,你應該仔細檢查一下。

Our examination of Parsons has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And it has passed with flying colours. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

我們對帕森斯的審查側重於某些可能使其收益看起來好於實際的因素。而且它已經以優異的成績過去了。但是,還有很多其他方法可以讓你對公司的看法。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟的標誌,而另一些人則喜歡 「關注資金」,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。雖然可能需要你進行一些研究,但你可能會發現這份免費收集的擁有高股本回報率的公司,或者這份擁有大量內幕持股的股票清單很有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論