share_log

Ascentage Pharma Group International's (HKG:6855) Market Cap Dropped HK$1.1b Last Week; Retail Investors Bore the Brunt

Ascentage Pharma Group International's (HKG:6855) Market Cap Dropped HK$1.1b Last Week; Retail Investors Bore the Brunt

Ascentage Pharma Group International(港股代码:6855)的市值上周下降了11亿港元;零售投资者遭受了冲击
Simply Wall St ·  11/13 17:41

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Ascentage Pharma Group International's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 25 shareholders own 42% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • Ascentage Pharma Group International拥有大量散户投资者的所有权,这表明关键决策受到广大公众股东的影响。
  • 前25名股东拥有公司42%的股份
  • 使用分析师预测的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

If you want to know who really controls Ascentage Pharma Group International (HKG:6855), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制着Ascentage Pharma Group International(HKG: 6855),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,散户投资者拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为58%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

And last week, retail investors endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 8.2%.

上周,散户投资者遭受了最大的损失,该股下跌了8.2%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Ascentage Pharma Group International.

在下图中,我们放大了Ascentage Pharma Group International的不同所有权集团。

big
SEHK:6855 Ownership Breakdown November 13th 2024
SEHK: 6855 所有权明细 2024 年 11 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ascentage Pharma Group International?

关于Ascentage制药集团国际,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ascentage Pharma Group International. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Ascentage Pharma Group International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者在Ascentage Pharma Group International中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Ascentage Pharma Group International的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

big
SEHK:6855 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 13th 2024
SEHK: 6855 2024 年 11 月 13 日的收益和收入增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Ascentage Pharma Group International. Ascentage Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited is the second largest shareholder owning 7.8% of common stock, and SDIC Innovation Investment Management Co., Ltd. holds about 5.1% of the company stock.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Ascentage Pharma Group International进行有意义的投资。Ascentage Limited目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份的16%。武田制药有限公司是第二大股东,拥有7.8%的普通股,国投创新投资管理有限公司持有该公司约5.1%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我们的研究表明,前25名股东共同控制的公司股份不到一半,这意味着该公司的股票分布广泛,没有占主导地位的股东。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Ascentage Pharma Group International

Ascentage 制药集团国际的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Ascentage Pharma Group International. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own HK$8.3m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的最新数据显示,内部人士拥有的Ascentage Pharma Group International不到1%的股份。但是,他们可能会通过我们尚未掌握的公司结构获得间接利益。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部人士拥有价值830万港元的股票。绝对值可能比比例份额更重要。看到董事会成员拥有股票是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 58% stake in Ascentage Pharma Group International, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Ascentage Pharma Group International58%的大量股份,这表明这是一只相当受欢迎的股票。这种所有权水平赋予了广大公众的投资者一定的权力来影响董事会组成、高管薪酬和股息支付率等关键政策决策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With a stake of 5.1%, private equity firms could influence the Ascentage Pharma Group International board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司持有5.1%的股份,可能会影响Ascentage Pharma Group国际董事会。有些人可能会喜欢这样,因为私募股权有时是追究管理层责任的激进分子。但是其他时候,私募股权在公司上市后正在售罄。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 21%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们可以看到,私营公司拥有已发行股份的21%。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私营公司对上市公司的股票感兴趣。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

We can see that public companies hold 7.8% of the Ascentage Pharma Group International shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我们可以看到,上市公司持有Ascentage Pharma Group International已发行股票的7.8%。很难肯定地说,但这表明它们将商业利益交织在一起。这可能是一个战略利害关系,因此值得关注这个领域的所有权变动。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Ascentage Pharma Group International .

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。为此,你应该注意我们在Ascentage Pharma Group International发现的两个警告信号。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发