OK Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:001223) Adds CN¥392m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 75% Stake in That Gain
OK Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:001223) Adds CN¥392m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 75% Stake in That Gain
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant insider control over OK Science and Technology implies vested interests in company growth
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 67% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- Ok Science and Technology的重要内部控制意味着对公司增长的既得利益。
- 共有2名投资者拥有该公司的67%所有权。
- 公司过去的业绩以及所有权数据,有助于形成对业务前景的强烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of OK Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:001223), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 75% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解谁真正控制着深圳Ok Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:001223),重要的是要了解该企业的所有权结构。个别内部人士持有75%的股份,在公司中拥有最多股份。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥3.0b market cap following a 15% gain in the stock.
作为结果,内幕人士在上周得分最高,因公司股价上涨15%,达到30亿元人民币的市值。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of OK Science and Technology.
在下面的图表中,我们放大查看Ok科技的不同所有权群体。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About OK Science and Technology?
机构持股告诉我们关于Ok科技的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Less than 5% of OK Science and Technology is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.
Ok科技只有不到5%的股份被机构投资者持有。这表明一些基金正在关注该公司,但许多尚未购买其股票。如果业务在这一点上变得更强大,我们可能会看到更多机构渴望购买的情况。当多个机构投资者希望购买股票时,我们经常看到股价上涨。过去的营业收入轨迹(如下图所示)可能是未来增长的一个指示,但没有保证。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in OK Science and Technology. Jiansheng Hu is currently the largest shareholder, with 40% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 28% and 7.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Fusheng Hu, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
我们注意到,对OK科技没有意义的对冲基金投资。 胡建生目前是最大股东,持有40%的股份。 与此同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股的28%和7.5%。 同时,作为第二大股东的胡福生还担任首席执行官。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 67% stake.
常州凯迪电气的内部人拥有明显的股权。它的市值仅为2.8亿元人民币,内部人拥有6.25亿元人民币的股份。我们认为这表现出与股东的一致性,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然相当小;一些内部人物可能创建了该业务。您可以单击此处以查看那些内部人物是否一直在买卖。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加研究价值,但研究分析师建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一个好习惯。该股票的一些分析人士需要更多的关注时间。
Insider Ownership Of OK Science and Technology
OK科技的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of OK Science and Technology Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥3.0b, that means they have CN¥2.2b worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据显示,内部人员拥有Ok科技有限公司的大部分所有权。这意味着他们可以集体为公司做出决策。鉴于它的市值为30亿人民币,这意味着他们持有价值22亿人民币的股份。大多数人会高兴地看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可以免费查看他们是否一直在买卖。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over OK Science and Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众拥有21%的股权,主要由个人投资者组成,对Ok科技有限公司具有一定程度的影响力。虽然占有量相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand OK Science and Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with OK Science and Technology (including 1 which shouldn't be ignored) .
考虑在公司拥有股份的不同群体始终是值得的。但要更好地了解Ok Science and Technology,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,您应该了解我们发现的Ok Science and Technology存在的4个警示信号(其中1个不容忽视)。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。